-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[pt] Improved the disambiguation.xml #10868
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a new disambiguation rule in the Portuguese language module of LanguageTool. This rule specifies a pattern that matches a sequence of tokens based on their part-of-speech (POS) tags, including verbs, determiners, and specific tokens. The rule includes a marker for first-person singular verbs and defines an action to remove certain matching tokens. This change enhances the tool's ability to process verb forms in grammatical checks. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labelsPortuguese Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- languagetool-language-modules/pt/src/main/resources/org/languagetool/resource/pt/disambiguation.xml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
languagetool-language-modules/pt/src/main/resources/org/languagetool/resource/pt/disambiguation.xml (1)
240-250
: Review of the new disambiguation rule for handling "como"The new rule added from lines 240 to 250 aims to address the misclassification of "como" in specific contexts by removing certain POS tags when the pattern matches. The rule is well-formed and targets the correct sequence of tokens with the specified POS tags. This should effectively improve the handling of "como" in the mentioned contexts.
However, it's crucial to ensure that this rule does not interfere with other valid usages of "como" in different contexts. It would be beneficial to add more examples within the rule to demonstrate its correct application and to ensure it does not produce unintended matches.
Please consider adding more example sentences to this rule to demonstrate its effectiveness and to ensure it does not affect other usages of "como". Would you like me to suggest some example sentences based on typical usages in Portuguese?
<token min='1' max='2' postag="[DP].+" postag_regexp="yes"/> | ||
<token postag="Z0[FM]P0" postag_regexp="yes"/> | ||
<marker> | ||
<token postag="VMIP1S0" postag_regexp="no"/> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If this rule is intended only to disambiguate "como", you could write explicitly "como" there. It will be safer.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am not sure if it only works with “como”.
It also works with “logo”.
I based myself on the rule I was working on.
I was expecting to look at the night diff to see the results and later fix it in case there are false positives.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Anyway, something is missing. If the word inside the <marker>
is only verb (or verb and noun), all POS tags will be removed. I would add some other conditions: specific words (como, logo), or other POS tags (CS, PT, RG...)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- languagetool-language-modules/pt/src/main/resources/org/languagetool/resource/pt/disambiguation.xml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- languagetool-language-modules/pt/src/main/resources/org/languagetool/resource/pt/disambiguation.xml
Heya, @jaumeortola , @susanaboatto and @p-goulart ,
This enhancement fixes sentences like:
“como” no longer appears as a noun nor as a verb.
It should be a low-impact change since it is a strict rule, but one must look at the nightly diffs.
😛 😛 😛 😛 😛 😛 😛 😛
Summary by CodeRabbit