Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[pt] Improved the disambiguation.xml #10868

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 8, 2024

Conversation

marcoagpinto
Copy link
Member

@marcoagpinto marcoagpinto commented Sep 8, 2024

Heya, @jaumeortola , @susanaboatto and @p-goulart ,

This enhancement fixes sentences like:

A equipe fundiu as duas como uma forma de meio-termo.
A equipe fundiu as suas duas como uma forma de meio-termo.
A equipe fundiu umas duas como uma forma de meio-termo.

“como” no longer appears as a noun nor as a verb.

It should be a low-impact change since it is a strict rule, but one must look at the nightly diffs.

😛 😛 😛 😛 😛 😛 😛 😛

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a new disambiguation rule for the Portuguese language module to enhance grammatical accuracy by refining the handling of specific verb forms in context.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 8, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a new disambiguation rule in the Portuguese language module of LanguageTool. This rule specifies a pattern that matches a sequence of tokens based on their part-of-speech (POS) tags, including verbs, determiners, and specific tokens. The rule includes a marker for first-person singular verbs and defines an action to remove certain matching tokens. This change enhances the tool's ability to process verb forms in grammatical checks.

Changes

Files Change Summary
languagetool-language-modules/pt/src/main/resources/.../disambiguation.xml Added a new <rule> with a specific POS pattern for disambiguation.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

Portuguese


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 826be45 and b9e57d5.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • languagetool-language-modules/pt/src/main/resources/org/languagetool/resource/pt/disambiguation.xml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
languagetool-language-modules/pt/src/main/resources/org/languagetool/resource/pt/disambiguation.xml (1)

240-250: Review of the new disambiguation rule for handling "como"

The new rule added from lines 240 to 250 aims to address the misclassification of "como" in specific contexts by removing certain POS tags when the pattern matches. The rule is well-formed and targets the correct sequence of tokens with the specified POS tags. This should effectively improve the handling of "como" in the mentioned contexts.

However, it's crucial to ensure that this rule does not interfere with other valid usages of "como" in different contexts. It would be beneficial to add more examples within the rule to demonstrate its correct application and to ensure it does not produce unintended matches.

Please consider adding more example sentences to this rule to demonstrate its effectiveness and to ensure it does not affect other usages of "como". Would you like me to suggest some example sentences based on typical usages in Portuguese?

<token min='1' max='2' postag="[DP].+" postag_regexp="yes"/>
<token postag="Z0[FM]P0" postag_regexp="yes"/>
<marker>
<token postag="VMIP1S0" postag_regexp="no"/>
Copy link
Member

@jaumeortola jaumeortola Sep 8, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If this rule is intended only to disambiguate "como", you could write explicitly "como" there. It will be safer.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jaumeortola

I am not sure if it only works with “como”.

It also works with “logo”.

I based myself on the rule I was working on.

I was expecting to look at the night diff to see the results and later fix it in case there are false positives.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Anyway, something is missing. If the word inside the <marker> is only verb (or verb and noun), all POS tags will be removed. I would add some other conditions: specific words (como, logo), or other POS tags (CS, PT, RG...)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jaumeortola

I have done it hours ago.

Let me refresh the review.

@marcoagpinto
Copy link
Member Author

@jaumeortola

Done!

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between b9e57d5 and 6cd36fb.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • languagetool-language-modules/pt/src/main/resources/org/languagetool/resource/pt/disambiguation.xml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • languagetool-language-modules/pt/src/main/resources/org/languagetool/resource/pt/disambiguation.xml

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants