Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(shared-data): Re-apply update tip overlap values for Flex Pipettes (#15147) #15284

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jun 5, 2024

Conversation

sfoster1
Copy link
Member

@sfoster1 sfoster1 commented May 29, 2024

This is #15147 again but this time outside the context of an extremely imminent release.

While this code needs to be merged, we should carefully consider how we do so. We can't ship this until we can separate this behavior by API level so that customers who may have tuned in offsets based on the old incorrect tip offsets won't have their protocols invalidated - this data needs to be loaded by API level.

Closes EXEC-452

@sfoster1 sfoster1 added the DO NOT MERGE Indicates a PR should not be merged, even if there's a shiny green merge button available label May 29, 2024
@sfoster1 sfoster1 requested review from a team as code owners May 29, 2024 18:14
@sfoster1 sfoster1 requested review from brenthagen and removed request for a team May 29, 2024 18:14
@sfoster1 sfoster1 changed the base branch from edge to chore_internal-release-1.5.1 May 31, 2024 16:23
@sfoster1 sfoster1 requested a review from a team as a code owner May 31, 2024 16:23
@sfoster1 sfoster1 removed the DO NOT MERGE Indicates a PR should not be merged, even if there's a shiny green merge button available label May 31, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@SyntaxColoring SyntaxColoring left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved previously in #15147, looks good if and when the versioning considerations are solved.

@sfoster1 sfoster1 force-pushed the chore-update-tip-overlap branch 3 times, most recently from a32d587 to be140b8 Compare June 4, 2024 20:34
After conducting hardware testing, we've formulated updated tip overlap
values for every tip size and pipette model. These adjustments apply to
1-channel, 8-channel, and 96-channel pipettes. These revised values aim
to mitigate overpressure occurrences in ABR.

[https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/16dEmqulO4SIKU6E0aYTfVQEnZRTn3MwNF_WB8K1KmRM/edit#gid=0](url)

- Added v2 tip overlap values for all flex pipette-tip combos
Change API version 2.19 to use the new tip overlap values that should
reduce overpressure errors.

Closes EXEC-452
@Carlos-fernandez Carlos-fernandez self-requested a review June 5, 2024 17:32
Copy link
Contributor

@Carlos-fernandez Carlos-fernandez left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All looks correct! Good to go!

@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
ENGINE_CORE_API_VERSION: Final = APIVersion(2, 14)
SET_OFFSET_RESTORED_API_VERSION: Final = APIVersion(2, 18)


Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

snuck in there

Copy link
Contributor

@TamarZanzouri TamarZanzouri left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice! LGTM!

@skowalski08 skowalski08 self-requested a review June 5, 2024 18:40
Copy link
Contributor

@skowalski08 skowalski08 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

tested 2.18,2.19, and json -lgtm

@sfoster1 sfoster1 merged commit 1754667 into chore_internal-release-1.5.1 Jun 5, 2024
41 checks passed
@sfoster1 sfoster1 deleted the chore-update-tip-overlap branch June 5, 2024 19:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants