-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Change figure & figcaption accName computation #359
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
23 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
941668e
Change figure & figcaption accName computation
scottaohara c1f0436
Merge branch 'gh-pages' into figure-figcaption-revision
scottaohara 472d40e
Merge branch 'gh-pages' into figure-figcaption-revision
scottaohara 0a0f361
resolve review comments
scottaohara 8d36f54
Merge branch 'gh-pages' into figure-figcaption-revision
scottaohara 8e3e598
indicate figcaption maps to caption
scottaohara 8841502
add in AX details for figure's relationship to figcaption
scottaohara 295f94b
Merge branch 'gh-pages' into figure-figcaption-revision
scottaohara 4bae8c9
Merge branch 'gh-pages' into figure-figcaption-revision
scottaohara eee657b
Merge branch 'gh-pages' into figure-figcaption-revision
scottaohara 4471139
Merge branch 'gh-pages' into figure-figcaption-revision
scottaohara a8a4c01
finish up mapping detials
scottaohara f22b76b
Merge branch 'gh-pages' into figure-figcaption-revision
scottaohara 1108f16
attempt to fix build error
scottaohara 6fa6be7
Merge branch 'gh-pages' into figure-figcaption-revision
scottaohara db3e5b7
fix the broken accname/desc references
scottaohara 82af13a
Merge branch 'gh-pages' into figure-figcaption-revision
scottaohara 3fd830d
Merge branch 'gh-pages' into figure-figcaption-revision
scottaohara 2339df0
add comment regarding aria-details
scottaohara 7263462
Merge branch 'gh-pages' into figure-figcaption-revision
scottaohara 7839c03
update based on review suggestions
scottaohara 9a81370
Merge branch 'gh-pages' into figure-figcaption-revision
scottaohara 2380d76
Merge branch 'gh-pages' into figure-figcaption-revision
scottaohara File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For figure, we're explicit that aria-labelledby, aria-describedby or aria-details prevent exposure of the details relation. However, we're not similarly explicit here for the reverse relation. Common sense will hopefully prevail, but I don't love relying on common sense for a spec. Is there something I'm missing that would otherwise make this explicit?
This is a similar situation to https://github.com/w3c/html-aam/pull/481/files#r1424943049. It seems we tend to use ARIA to express roles in a cross-platform manner wherever possible now, but we don't do that for relations, I guess largely because reverse relations and the details-roles attribute complicate things.