Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

west.yml: update Zephyr to 5554fd17b651 #8981

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

kv2019i
Copy link
Collaborator

@kv2019i kv2019i commented Mar 25, 2024

Includes following commits affecting SOF targets:

3fde2c50c6ef tracing: add intel ADSP memory window backend
6b9d01f995c7 intel_adsp/ace: power: No pending transaction before power gate
64ba1b221091 dts: nxp: imx93: add nodes for SAI3 and EDMA4

@kv2019i
Copy link
Collaborator Author

kv2019i commented Mar 25, 2024

@dbaluta @LaurentiuM1234 This seems to need a SOF side fix for
devicetree error: Label 'sai3' appears on /dai@42660000 and on /memory@42660000

@lyakh Really don't know what to do with the sparse checks? It's not really sustainable for SOF to check for things not done in Zephyr. Can we limit these checks to SOF code?

@LaurentiuM1234
Copy link
Contributor

@dbaluta @LaurentiuM1234 This seems to need a SOF side fix for devicetree error: Label 'sai3' appears on /dai@42660000 and on /memory@42660000

@lyakh Really don't know what to do with the sparse checks? It's not really sustainable for SOF to check for things not done in Zephyr. Can we limit these checks to SOF code?

Thanks for the ping! Issue should be solved by #8520 which does the transition to Zephyr native drivers on 93. Is there any way we can merge that one first? (also does a Zephyr hash bump)

Includes following commits affecting SOF targets:

3fde2c50c6ef tracing: add intel ADSP memory window backend
6b9d01f995c7 intel_adsp/ace: power: No pending transaction before power gate

Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <[email protected]>
@lyakh
Copy link
Collaborator

lyakh commented Mar 26, 2024

@lyakh Really don't know what to do with the sparse checks? It's not really sustainable for SOF to check for things not done in Zephyr. Can we limit these checks to SOF code?

@kv2019i well, remember - it's Zephyr where sparse is actually called from, so, it would seem strange to me to have Zephyr call sparse while not letting it process Zephyr code itself

@kv2019i
Copy link
Collaborator Author

kv2019i commented Mar 26, 2024

zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr#70725 filed for the mtl sparse zephyr warning.

@kv2019i
Copy link
Collaborator Author

kv2019i commented Apr 2, 2024

#8945 merged instead, closing this one.

@kv2019i kv2019i closed this Apr 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants