Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for noobaa on client clusters #176

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 3, 2024

Conversation

ezio-auditore
Copy link

@ezio-auditore ezio-auditore commented Jul 2, 2024

1.Fetch noobaa remote join secret (noobaa-remote-join-secret-{clusterID}) from the provider server via GetStorageConfig Ref: red-hat-storage/ocs-operator#2680
1. auth_token to be used for authentication with provider noobaa
2. mgmt_addr to be use for getting the address of the provider noobaa server

  1. Creation of the join secret in client clusters noobaa-remote-join-secret
  2. Creation of a remote Noobaa CR referencing the join secret
    Part of RHSTOR-5187

service/status-report/main.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
service/status-report/main.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
controllers/storageclient_controller.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
service/status-report/main.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
service/status-report/main.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@rchikatw
Copy link
Contributor

It would be beneficial to include testing results and a PR description to avoid the need to navigate through the epic.

controllers/storageclient_controller.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
controllers/storageclient_controller.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
controllers/storageclient_controller.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
service/status-report/main.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
controllers/storageclient_controller.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
controllers/storageclient_controller.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
controllers/storageclient_controller.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
controllers/storageclient_controller.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
controllers/storageclient_controller.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
controllers/storageclient_controller.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@nb-ohad
Copy link
Contributor

nb-ohad commented Jul 24, 2024

/lgtm

@nb-ohad
Copy link
Contributor

nb-ohad commented Sep 3, 2024

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label Sep 3, 2024
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 3, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ezio-auditore, nb-ohad, rewantsoni

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ezio-auditore
Copy link
Author

/unhold

@ezio-auditore
Copy link
Author

/test tide

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 3, 2024

@ezio-auditore: No presubmit jobs available for red-hat-storage/ocs-client-operator@main

In response to this:

/test tide

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 111ba8c into red-hat-storage:main Sep 3, 2024
12 checks passed
@ezio-auditore
Copy link
Author

/cherry-pick release-4.17

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@ezio-auditore: new pull request created: #221

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.17

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants