Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add additional CI via GitHub Actions. #386

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 10, 2024
Merged

Conversation

waywardmonkeys
Copy link
Contributor

@waywardmonkeys waywardmonkeys commented Feb 10, 2024

This adds CI via GitHub Actions for various targets, some of which haven't been tested via CI before.

  • Autotools (Mac and Linux).
  • cmake on iOS using Xcode.
  • cmake on macOS using ninja.
  • cmake on Linux using ninja, with both clang and gcc checked.
  • cmake on Windows using MSVC (x64 and x86, Clang, ARM64, Windows Store).
  • Documentation via Sphinx.
  • Meson on macOS and Linux.
  • MSBuild on Windows (x64 and x86).
  • Swift on macOS and Linux.

There are some things that could be improved in subsequent PRs:

  • Remove Appveyor config and README link.
  • Remove TravisCI config. I left this as it contains the old config for coverage.
  • Add code coverage again.
  • Fix building ARM and ARM64 targets via MSBuild.
  • Fix building ARM via cmake on Windows.
  • Have Sphinx fail on warnings (but keep going), once Sphinx warnings are fixed.
  • Add tests for Swift and run them.
  • Add emscripten builds + tests, absorbing the other 2 workflow configurations.
  • Make sure SIMD is built and tested where available.
  • Add msys2 builds.
  • Add Linux ARM64 builds.

@waywardmonkeys
Copy link
Contributor Author

You can see all of the CI checks here in this PR as they're prefixed with "CI /"

@recp recp merged commit b89315f into recp:master Feb 10, 2024
74 checks passed
@recp
Copy link
Owner

recp commented Feb 10, 2024

@waywardmonkeys many thanks for CI support 🤗 the PR is merged 🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants