Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Replace deprecated experimental.FunctionListenerFactoryKey with experimental.WithFunctionListenerFactory #108

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 10, 2024

Conversation

chansuke
Copy link
Member

@chansuke chansuke commented Jun 9, 2024

What type of PR is this?

/kind bug

What this PR does / why we need it:

experimental.FunctionListenerFactoryKey is deprecated and make check is failing on main branch.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

NONE

What are the benchmark results of this change?


@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. labels Jun 9, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jun 9, 2024
@chansuke chansuke marked this pull request as ready for review June 9, 2024 11:47
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jun 9, 2024
ctx := context.WithValue(context.Background(),
experimental.FunctionListenerFactoryKey{},

// Use `WithFunctionListenerFactory` instead of ``FunctionListenerFactoryKey`.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You may not need this comment because this is very minor change.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Gekko0114
I will remove this, thanks

@chansuke chansuke requested a review from Gekko0114 June 9, 2024 15:30
Copy link
Contributor

@codefromthecrypt codefromthecrypt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks for the drift fix!

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: chansuke, codefromthecrypt

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 10, 2024
@codefromthecrypt codefromthecrypt merged commit 06c9f99 into kubernetes-sigs:main Jun 10, 2024
5 of 6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants