-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Task one analysis #20
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
hey @jideilori , I think this is actually a brilliant logic and another way to go especially if we want to specifically follow what hamoye suggested regarding task one. great job overall!
Insighful analysis. |
yea, thanks but going through the notebook again I think I made a mistake in the notebook when separating 'animation jobs' from 'all jobs' |
Good work to start with. Try to correctly check and rectify the mistake. |
All jobs for animated and non-animated movies were extracted and one-hot encoded. logistic regression was used to classify the move as animated with value (1) or non-animated with value (0)
@jideilori The latest commit looks spot on! Can you also compare the logistic regression to RFC, XGBC and CBC? So, the best model can be obtained. |
Good work. Just wondering, can you possibly make the plot bars? Don't mind me, I prefer bars because it can easily show variations in values without having to do a lot of mental work. Also, I'm not quite sure I understand the arrangement of Animation and not animation in the heatmap. |
@jideilori intuitive work! I'm curious, can we see those jobs peculiar to each classification and how frequently they occur in the dataset? |
Please kindly, review the notebook