Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update infisical-secrets-check.yml #25

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 7, 2024
Merged

Update infisical-secrets-check.yml #25

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 7, 2024

Conversation

guibranco
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link

korbit-ai bot commented Jul 7, 2024

My review is in progress 📖 - I will have feedback for you in a few minutes!

Copy link

Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior:

  1. /.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml - Adding permissions for "pull-requests: write" might expose sensitive data to unauthorized users if not carefully managed.

Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency:

  1. /.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml - Ensure that the permissions granted for "pull-requests: write" are necessary and strictly limited to what is required for the workflow to function correctly. Regularly review and update these permissions to avoid any potential security risks.

Copy link

👋 Hi there!

  1. Include a description or comment explaining the purpose of the added permissions for clarity.
  2. Ensure that the added permissions (contents: read, pull-requests: write) align with security and access control policies.
  3. Consider adding validation steps to confirm that the permissions are correctly configured and have the intended effect.

The description could be more helpful.


Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo.
Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at [email protected].

Copy link

gooroo-dev bot commented Jul 7, 2024

Please double-check what I found in the pull request:

Issue Counts

🐞Mistake 🤪Typo 🚨Security 🚀Performance 💪Best Practices 📖Readability ❓Others
0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Summary of Proposed Changes

  • 🛠️ Added permissions block to the secrets-scan job in the GitHub Actions workflow.
  • 🛠️ Set contents permission to read.
  • 🛠️ Set pull-requests permission to write.

Identified Issues

No issues found in the proposed changes.

General Review

The code quality and style are good. The addition of the permissions block is a necessary update to ensure the workflow has the correct permissions to operate. No issues were found in the proposed changes.

Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev
Your input is valuable! Please reply or add a reaction.

Copy link

@senior-dev-bot senior-dev-bot bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Feedback from Senior Dev Bot

Comment on lines 12 to 20

secrets-scan:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
permissions:
contents: read
pull-requests: write
steps:

- name: Checkout repo
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CODE REVIEW

Adding permissions is crucial for security compliance. Here are two improvements:

  1. Explicit Permissions:
    Define the exact permissions needed. Scopes such as pull-requests: write might be too broad.
permissions:
  contents: read
  pull-requests: write  # Confirm this is necessary
  1. Comments for Clarity:
    Comment why each permission is needed for future reference.
permissions:
  contents: read  # Required to read repository content
  pull-requests: write  # Required for pull request modifications

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 7, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@guibranco has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 29 minutes and 4 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0dde8a4 and 0ec7fa3.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codeclimate bot commented Jul 7, 2024

Code Climate has analyzed commit 0ec7fa3 and detected 0 issues on this pull request.

View more on Code Climate.

Copy link

@korbit-ai korbit-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have reviewed your code and did not find any issues!


Please note that I can make mistakes, and you should still encourage your team to review your code as well.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 7, 2024

Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked!

Scan results:

1:46AM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
1:46AM INF 24 commits scanned.
1:46AM INF scan completed in 64.5ms
1:46AM INF no leaks found

@guibranco guibranco merged commit 5ce8461 into main Jul 7, 2024
7 of 8 checks passed
@guibranco guibranco deleted the guibranco-patch-1 branch July 7, 2024 02:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant