-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update infisical-secrets-check.yml #25
Conversation
My review is in progress 📖 - I will have feedback for you in a few minutes! |
Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior:
Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency:
|
👋 Hi there!
The description could be more helpful.
|
Please double-check what I found in the pull request:Issue Counts
Summary of Proposed Changes
Identified IssuesNo issues found in the proposed changes. General ReviewThe code quality and style are good. The addition of the Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Feedback from Senior Dev Bot
|
||
secrets-scan: | ||
runs-on: ubuntu-latest | ||
permissions: | ||
contents: read | ||
pull-requests: write | ||
steps: | ||
|
||
- name: Checkout repo |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
CODE REVIEW
Adding permissions is crucial for security compliance. Here are two improvements:
- Explicit Permissions:
Define the exact permissions needed. Scopes such aspull-requests: write
might be too broad.
permissions:
contents: read
pull-requests: write # Confirm this is necessary
- Comments for Clarity:
Comment why each permission is needed for future reference.
permissions:
contents: read # Required to read repository content
pull-requests: write # Required for pull request modifications
Warning Rate limit exceeded@guibranco has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 29 minutes and 4 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
Code Climate has analyzed commit 0ec7fa3 and detected 0 issues on this pull request. View more on Code Climate. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have reviewed your code and did not find any issues!
Please note that I can make mistakes, and you should still encourage your team to review your code as well.
Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked! Scan results:
|
No description provided.