Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(llmobs): recreate writer on fork [backport 2.12] #10330

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 22, 2024

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot commented Aug 22, 2024

Backport 64b5804 from #10249 to 2.12.

This PR ensures that the LLMObsSpanWriter is correctly recreated and restarted on a forked process.

Previously, on a process fork we were not recreating/restarting the writer worker correctly. This resulted in situations with using celery/gunicorn where LLMObs spans were created, but never submitted as the forked worker process did not have a running writer thread.

Checklist

  • PR author has checked that all the criteria below are met
  • The PR description includes an overview of the change
  • The PR description articulates the motivation for the change
  • The change includes tests OR the PR description describes a testing strategy
  • The PR description notes risks associated with the change, if any
  • Newly-added code is easy to change
  • The change follows the library release note guidelines
  • The change includes or references documentation updates if necessary
  • Backport labels are set (if applicable)

Reviewer Checklist

  • Reviewer has checked that all the criteria below are met
  • Title is accurate
  • All changes are related to the pull request's stated goal
  • Avoids breaking API changes
  • Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risks
  • Newly-added code is easy to change
  • Release note makes sense to a user of the library
  • If necessary, author has acknowledged and discussed the performance implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment
  • Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the release branch maintenance policy

This PR ensures that the LLMObsSpanWriter is correctly recreated and
restarted on a forked process.

Previously, on a process fork we were not recreating/restarting the
writer worker correctly. This resulted in situations with using
celery/gunicorn where LLMObs spans were created, but never submitted as
the forked worker process did not have a running writer thread.

## Checklist
- [x] PR author has checked that all the criteria below are met
- The PR description includes an overview of the change
- The PR description articulates the motivation for the change
- The change includes tests OR the PR description describes a testing
strategy
- The PR description notes risks associated with the change, if any
- Newly-added code is easy to change
- The change follows the [library release note
guidelines](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes.html)
- The change includes or references documentation updates if necessary
- Backport labels are set (if
[applicable](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting))

## Reviewer Checklist
- [x] Reviewer has checked that all the criteria below are met
- Title is accurate
- All changes are related to the pull request's stated goal
- Avoids breaking
[API](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/versioning.html#interfaces)
changes
- Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risks
- Newly-added code is easy to change
- Release note makes sense to a user of the library
- If necessary, author has acknowledged and discussed the performance
implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment
- Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the
[release branch maintenance
policy](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting)

---------

Co-authored-by: Sam Brenner <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 64b5804)
@datadog-dd-trace-py-rkomorn
Copy link

datadog-dd-trace-py-rkomorn bot commented Aug 22, 2024

Datadog Report

Branch report: backport-10249-to-2.12
Commit report: f308f2d
Test service: dd-trace-py

✅ 0 Failed, 1505 Passed, 39485 Skipped, 27m 33.44s Total Time

@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented Aug 22, 2024

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2024-08-22 14:38:07

Comparing candidate commit c7e23cc in PR branch backport-10249-to-2.12 with baseline commit fb92daf in branch 2.12.

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 353 metrics, 47 unstable metrics.

@emmettbutler emmettbutler reopened this Aug 22, 2024
@emmettbutler emmettbutler enabled auto-merge (squash) August 22, 2024 17:28
Copy link
Contributor Author

CODEOWNERS have been resolved as:

releasenotes/notes/fix-llmobs-forked-writer-257b993bcf131af8.yaml       @DataDog/apm-python
ddtrace/llmobs/__init__.py                                              @DataDog/ml-observability
ddtrace/llmobs/_llmobs.py                                               @DataDog/ml-observability
ddtrace/llmobs/_writer.py                                               @DataDog/ml-observability
tests/llmobs/test_llmobs_service.py                                     @DataDog/ml-observability

@emmettbutler emmettbutler merged commit c74dfb4 into 2.12 Aug 22, 2024
121 of 123 checks passed
@emmettbutler emmettbutler deleted the backport-10249-to-2.12 branch August 22, 2024 21:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants