Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

ci: fix govulncheck workflow #81

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 24, 2024
Merged

ci: fix govulncheck workflow #81

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 24, 2024

Conversation

fbac
Copy link
Contributor

@fbac fbac commented Jul 23, 2024 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

Closes #67

Changes

  • Use the official govulncheck action.
  • Generate a sarif file and upload it to create a security review.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced an automated workflow for checking vulnerabilities in Go dependencies to enhance project security.

  • Chores

    • Created a new GitHub Actions workflow file to facilitate automated vulnerability detection and reporting for Go packages.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 23, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

This commit introduces a new GitHub Actions workflow file, govulncheck.yml, designed to automate the detection of vulnerabilities in Go dependencies. Triggered by specific events such as pushes to the main branch and various pull request activities, it runs a job that checks for known vulnerabilities, formats the results as SARIF, and uploads them to GitHub for easy analysis. This enhancement significantly improves the project's security by enabling proactive identification and resolution of dependency issues.

Changes

Files Changed Change Summary
.github/workflows/govulncheck.yml New workflow to automate Go dependency vulnerability checks.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Fix vulncheck workflow (#67) ✅

🐇 In the meadow, hopping with glee,
A workflow now checks for vulnerabilities!
With SARIF in hand, we’ll spot any flaw,
Our code more secure, oh what a score!
Let’s code with joy, let the bunnies cheer,
For safer dependencies, we hold dear! 🥕✨

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot reviewed Jul 23, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3106ecc and 2d5d29d.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/govulncheck.yml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (6)
.github/workflows/govulncheck.yml (6)

1-1: LGTM!

The workflow name is clear and descriptive.

3-14: LGTM!

The triggers cover essential events for running vulnerability checks.

16-17: LGTM!

The permissions are appropriately scoped for the workflow.

19-21: LGTM!

The job setup is standard and appropriate for the task.

23-31: LGTM!

The step to run govulncheck is correctly configured with appropriate inputs.

33-36: LGTM!

The step to upload the SARIF file is correctly configured with appropriate inputs.

@github-advanced-security
Copy link

This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation.

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot reviewed Jul 23, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2d5d29d and 1fa4aac.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/govulncheck.yml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/govulncheck.yml

gartnera
gartnera approved these changes Jul 23, 2024
View reviewed changes
.github/workflows/govulncheck.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@fbac
ci: fix govulncheck workflow
e6e9414 
Signed-off-by: Francisco de Borja Aranda Castillejo <[email protected]>
coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot reviewed Jul 23, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1fa4aac and e6e9414.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/govulncheck.yml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/govulncheck.yml

@lumtis lumtis merged commit d73b7bd into main Jul 24, 2024
25 checks passed
@fbac fbac mentioned this pull request Jul 25, 2024
Closed
@fbac fbac self-assigned this Jul 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@coderabbitai coderabbitai coderabbitai left review comments

@gartnera gartnera gartnera approved these changes

@lumtis lumtis lumtis approved these changes

@CharlieMc0 CharlieMc0 Awaiting requested review from CharlieMc0

@brewmaster012 brewmaster012 Awaiting requested review from brewmaster012

@swift1337 swift1337 Awaiting requested review from swift1337

@skosito skosito Awaiting requested review from skosito

@kingpinXD kingpinXD Awaiting requested review from kingpinXD

Assignees

@fbac fbac

Labels
Type: CI
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

ci: fix vulncheck workflow
3 participants
@fbac @gartnera @lumtis