feat: deploy instant rewards to athens #189
Conversation
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces several updates across multiple files. It adds a Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
andresaiello
deleted the
andy/pd-6643-deploy-instant-rewards-to-athens-and-update-npm
branch
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- .github/workflows/publish-npm.yaml (1 hunks)
- packages/zevm-app-contracts/data/addresses.json (1 hunks)
- packages/zevm-app-contracts/package.json (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- packages/zevm-app-contracts/package.json
Additional comments not posted (1)
packages/zevm-app-contracts/data/addresses.json (1)
10-11: LGTM! Verify the contract addresses.The addition of the "InstantRewards" entry in the
addresses.jsonfile follows the existing pattern and appears to be correct. However, please ensure that the Ethereum addresses used for the "InstantRewards" contract are accurate for the respective testnet and mainnet environments.To verify the contract addresses, you can use the following script:
If the script outputs match the expected addresses, then the changes are good to go. Otherwise, please double-check and update the addresses accordingly.
Verification successful
Contract Addresses Verified Successfully
The "InstantRewards" contract addresses in the
addresses.jsonfile have been successfully verified. The extracted addresses match the expected values for both testnet and mainnet environments:
- Testnet: 0x10DfEd4ba9b8F6a1c998E829FfC0325D533c80E3
- Mainnet: 0x018412ec1D5bBb864eAe0A4BECaa683052890238
The addition of these addresses to the JSON file is correct and consistent with the existing structure. No further action is required.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the "InstantRewards" contract addresses. # Test: Check if the testnet address is valid. Expect: 0x10DfEd4ba9b8F6a1c998E829FfC0325D533c80E3 jq -r '.zevm.zeta_testnet.InstantRewards' packages/zevm-app-contracts/data/addresses.json # Test: Check if the mainnet address is valid. Expect: 0x018412ec1D5bBb864eAe0A4BECaa683052890238 jq -r '.zevm.zeta_mainnet.InstantRewards' packages/zevm-app-contracts/data/addresses.jsonLength of output: 265
| @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ jobs: | |||
| env: | |||
| NODE_AUTH_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.NPM_TOKEN }} | |||
| GITHUB_REF: ${{ github.ref }} | |||
| continue-on-error: true | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider the implications of allowing the job to continue despite errors.
Adding continue-on-error: true to the job configuration can lead to unexpected behavior or inconsistent state in subsequent steps if not handled carefully.
I recommend the following:
-
Assess the criticality of the "Publish to NPM zeta app contracts" job for the overall workflow's success. If it's essential, consider removing the
continue-on-errorproperty to fail fast and prevent further issues. -
If allowing the job to fail silently is acceptable, ensure that proper error handling and logging mechanisms are in place to track and manage failures gracefully. This will help in identifying and debugging issues if they occur.
-
Document the rationale behind allowing the job to continue despite errors, so that future maintainers understand the decision and its implications.
By addressing these points, you can strike a balance between resilience and reliability in your workflow design.
Summary
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements
Version Update