Port NXP ADSP soc/boards to HWMv2

[iuliana-prodan]

Port NXP ADSP SoC family and boards to HWMv2.

[iuliana-prodan]

This PR has a dependency on #69399

[iuliana-prodan]

v2:

• fix soc name in Kconfig - not it matches the one from soc.yml;
• fix comments from @nordicjm;
• fix compliance errors.

Regarding compliance checks - I still have 2 errors.

One is regarding nxp_adsp_rt595 - this is in process of porting to hwmv2 and it has nothing to do with this PR.

Next is:

Missing SoC names or CONFIG_SOC vs soc.yml out of sync:

soc name: mimx8qm6 not found in CONFIG_SOC defaults.
soc name: imx8ulp not found in CONFIG_SOC defaults.
soc name: mimx8ml8 not found in CONFIG_SOC defaults.
soc name: mimx8qx6 not found in CONFIG_SOC defaults.

This is false IMO. I have the CONFIG SOC defined for all 4 socs.
See, for example for mimx8qm6 -
soc.yml - https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/pull/69398/files#diff-57bf2b8b4543a2b08e7ae3d16f19acbfc8cfedd275cfd3756b1c1000f574268fR6
defconfig - https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/pull/69398/files#diff-76a8a7d05373ebb56c744e770e0ec4fa8dbcde98057a5ed3a562cd46c197303aR9
So, is something wrong here?

[iuliana-prodan]

This PR has a dependency on #69399

The dependency on #69399 was fixed by having the same soc name in Kconfig and soc.yml.
Now there's a dependency on zephyrproject-rtos/hal_nxp#341

[iuliana-prodan]

@nordicjm for compliance check I get:

Error: See https://docs.zephyrproject.org/latest/build/kconfig/tips.html for more details.

 Found references to undefined Kconfig symbols. If any of these are false
positives, then add them to UNDEF_KCONFIG_WHITELIST in /home/runner/work/zephyr/zephyr/./scripts/ci/check_compliance.py.

If the reference is for a comment like /* CONFIG_FOO_* */ (or
/* CONFIG_FOO_*_... */), then please use exactly that form (with the '*'). The
CI check knows not to flag it.

More generally, a reference followed by $, @, {, *, or ## will never be
flagged.

CONFIG_SOC_NXP_RT595                       boards/boards_legacy/xtensa/nxp_adsp_rt595/nxp_adsp_rt595_defconfig:2
CONFIG_SOC_SERIES_NXP_RT5XX                boards/boards_legacy/xtensa/nxp_adsp_rt595/nxp_adsp_rt595_defconfig:1

and this part if handled in another PR by @danieldegrasse - 56551e3

[nordicjm]

Did you rebase? There should be no compliance failures

[iuliana-prodan]

Did you rebase? There should be no compliance failures

I did, multiple times, but those errors are still there. :(
Am I missing something?

[iuliana-prodan]

@nordicjm & all, be aware that some intel_adsp tests will fail because I've update the sof repo here.
Before my change it was at pull/39/head (Intel's updates for HWMv2), now I've updated to pull/40/head (NXP's updates for HWMv2).
None of these PRs is merged in sof, yet.

[nordicjm]

@nordicjm & all, be aware that some intel_adsp tests will fail because I've update the sof repo here. Before my change it was at pull/39/head (Intel's updates for HWMv2), now I've updated to pull/40/head (NXP's updates for HWMv2). None of these PRs is merged in sof, yet.

You need to make a new commit on top of theirs or make a new PR with their commit included, we will not be merging any PRs where there are CI failures

[nordicjm]

Did you rebase? There should be no compliance failures

I did, multiple times, but those errors are still there. :( Am I missing something?

Then the issues are with your additions here

[iuliana-prodan]

@nordicjm all issues solved, CI is passing.