-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 121
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Watchdog] Add clients lists as an optional parameter to GetWatchdogViolations() #1182
Conversation
eccfac1
to
c34b439
Compare
c34b439
to
f8d04a5
Compare
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1182 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 56.47% 56.53% +0.06%
==========================================
Files 1899 1899
Lines 94216 94295 +79
==========================================
+ Hits 53205 53312 +107
+ Misses 41011 40983 -28
|
f8d04a5
to
d5d9e10
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems like it's logically sound but we can reduce the number of file I/O operations by just relying on the in memory violations map. This will also be simpler / easier to read code.
d5d9e10
to
2e7ef10
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems like it's logically sound but we can reduce the number of file I/O operations by just relying on the in memory violations map. This will also be simpler / easier to read code.
2e7ef10
to
7a61073
Compare
…ameter to GetWatchdogViolations() (#1195) Refer to the original PR: #1182 b/287302949 Co-authored-by: Sherry Zhou <[email protected]>
b/287302949