Slightly improve the coverage of the validator test

yannh · May 9, 2024 · f5168b6 · f5168b6
1 parent 20805f6
commit f5168b6
Showing 1 changed file with 37 additions and 4 deletions.
diff --git a/pkg/validator/validator_test.go b/pkg/validator/validator_test.go
@@ -32,7 +32,8 @@ func TestValidate(t *testing.T) {
 		schemaRegistry2              []byte
 		ignoreMissingSchema          bool
 		strict                       bool
-		expect                       Status
+		expectStatus                 Status
+		expectErrors                 []ValidationError
 	}{
 		{
 			"valid resource",
@@ -67,6 +68,7 @@ lastName: bar
 			false,
 			false,
 			Valid,
+			[]ValidationError{},
 		},
 		{
 			"invalid resource",
@@ -101,6 +103,12 @@ lastName: bar
 			false,
 			false,
 			Invalid,
+			[]ValidationError{
+				{
+					Path: "/firstName",
+					Msg:  "expected number, but got string",
+				},
+			},
 		},
 		{
 			"missing required field",
@@ -134,6 +142,12 @@ firstName: foo
 			false,
 			false,
 			Invalid,
+			[]ValidationError{
+				{
+					Path: "",
+					Msg:  "missing properties: 'lastName'",
+				},
+			},
 		},
 		{
 			"key \"firstName\" already set in map",
@@ -160,6 +174,7 @@ firstName: bar
 			false,
 			true,
 			Error,
+			[]ValidationError{},
 		},
 		{
 			"key firstname already set in map in non-strict mode",
@@ -186,6 +201,7 @@ firstName: bar
 			false,
 			false,
 			Valid,
+			[]ValidationError{},
 		},
 		{
 			"resource has invalid yaml",
@@ -223,6 +239,7 @@ lastName: bar
 			false,
 			false,
 			Error,
+			[]ValidationError{},
 		},
 		{
 			"missing schema in 1st registry",
@@ -260,6 +277,7 @@ lastName: bar
 			false,
 			false,
 			Valid,
+			[]ValidationError{},
 		},
 		{
 			"non-json response in 1st registry",
@@ -297,6 +315,7 @@ lastName: bar
 			false,
 			false,
 			Valid,
+			[]ValidationError{},
 		},
 		{
 			"missing schema in both registries, ignore missing",
@@ -311,6 +330,7 @@ lastName: bar
 			true,
 			false,
 			Skipped,
+			[]ValidationError{},
 		},
 		{
 			"missing schema in both registries, do not ignore missing",
@@ -325,6 +345,7 @@ lastName: bar
 			false,
 			false,
 			Error,
+			[]ValidationError{},
 		},
 		{
 			"non-json response in both registries, ignore missing",
@@ -339,6 +360,7 @@ lastName: bar
 			true,
 			false,
 			Skipped,
+			[]ValidationError{},
 		},
 		{
 			"non-json response in both registries, do not ignore missing",
@@ -353,6 +375,7 @@ lastName: bar
 			false,
 			false,
 			Error,
+			[]ValidationError{},
 		},
 	} {
 		val := v{
@@ -373,11 +396,21 @@ lastName: bar
 				}),
 			},
 		}
-		if got := val.ValidateResource(resource.Resource{Bytes: testCase.rawResource}); got.Status != testCase.expect {
+		got := val.ValidateResource(resource.Resource{Bytes: testCase.rawResource})
+		if got.Status != testCase.expectStatus {
 			if got.Err != nil {
-				t.Errorf("Test '%s' - expected %d, got %d: %s", testCase.name, testCase.expect, got.Status, got.Err.Error())
+				t.Errorf("Test '%s' - expected %d, got %d: %s", testCase.name, testCase.expectStatus, got.Status, got.Err.Error())
 			} else {
-				t.Errorf("%d - expected %d, got %d", i, testCase.expect, got.Status)
+				t.Errorf("Test '%s'- %d - expected %d, got %d", testCase.name, i, testCase.expectStatus, got.Status)
+			}
+		}
+
+		if len(got.ValidationErrors) != len(testCase.expectErrors) {
+			t.Errorf("Test '%s': expected ValidationErrors: %+v, got: % v", testCase.name, testCase.expectErrors, got.ValidationErrors)
+		}
+		for i, _ := range testCase.expectErrors {
+			if testCase.expectErrors[i] != got.ValidationErrors[i] {
+				t.Errorf("Test '%s': expected ValidationErrors: %+v, got: % v", testCase.name, testCase.expectErrors, got.ValidationErrors)
 			}
 		}
 	}