Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: test unit #19

Open
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -38,7 +38,10 @@ public class NebulaSysWebUtils {
private static final String STAGE = "stage";

private static final String PRD = "prd";



private static final String SRE = "dd";
private static final String RE = "dd";
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

⚠️ Potential issue

Unclear Purpose and Inconsistent Initialization of SRE and RE Constants

The constants SRE and RE in NebulaSysWebUtils.java are defined with the value "dd" but are not utilized anywhere else in the codebase. This raises several concerns:

  1. Unclear Purpose: It's unclear what "SRE" and "RE" represent within the application's context.
  2. Inconsistent Initialization: The value "dd" does not follow the naming pattern of other environment constants such as "dev", "test", "stage", and "prd".
  3. Redundancy: Since these constants are not used elsewhere, they might be unnecessary and could be removed to simplify the codebase.

Recommendations:

  • Clarify Intent: Provide comments or documentation explaining the purpose of SRE and RE.
  • Consistent Naming: Align the initialization values with existing environment constants (e.g., "sre" and "re" if they represent new environments).
  • Remove If Unused: Consider removing these constants if they are not serving a functional purpose in the application.
Analysis chain

Clarify the purpose of new constants and consider adding supporting methods.

The addition of SRE and RE constants raises a few concerns:

  1. The purpose of these constants is unclear. What do "SRE" and "RE" represent?
  2. Both constants are initialized with "dd", which doesn't follow the pattern of other environment constants (e.g., "dev", "test", "stage", "prd").
  3. There are no corresponding methods like isSRE() or isRE(), unlike the existing environment constants.

Consider the following actions:

  1. Add comments explaining the purpose of these new constants.
  2. Review if "dd" is the correct value or if it should match the naming convention (e.g., "sre" and "re").
  3. If these represent new environments, add corresponding methods:
public boolean isSRE() {
    return Objects.equals(active, SRE);
}

public boolean isRE() {
    return Objects.equals(active, RE);
}
  1. Update the class-level JavaDoc to mention these new environment types if they are indeed new environments.

To ensure these constants are used consistently across the project, run the following script:

This will help identify if these constants are used elsewhere and if there are any inconsistencies with the "dd" value.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for usage of SRE and RE constants and potential inconsistencies

# Search for SRE usage
echo "Searching for SRE usage:"
rg --type java "SRE" -C 3

echo "Searching for RE usage:"
rg --type java "RE" -C 3

echo "Checking for potential inconsistencies with 'dd' value:"
rg --type java '"dd"' -C 3

Length of output: 29473

/**
* 开发环境
*/
Expand Down