Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feat: Added Sonar lint #138

Conversation

himanshu-wedensday
Copy link

@himanshu-wedensday himanshu-wedensday commented May 9, 2024

Ticket Link


Related Links


Description


Steps to Reproduce / Test



Checklist

  • PR description included
  • yarn test passes
  • Tests are [changed or added]
  • Relevant documentation is changed or added (and PR referenced)

GIF's


Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced ESLint configuration with new plugins for improved code quality checks.
    • Updated GitHub Actions workflow to trigger on pull_request_target for better security practices.
    • Added descriptive constants for GraphQL arguments to standardize usage across queries.
  • Refactor

    • Simplified data access object functions in purchasedProducts.js by removing intermediate variables.
    • Streamlined model declaration in users.js to directly return the defined model.
    • Refactored GraphQL utility functions to use separate variables for clearer query handling.
    • Optimized GraphQL test setups by introducing a shared variable for field type paths.
  • Chores

    • Updated package dependencies to include new ESLint plugins.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented May 9, 2024

Walkthrough

The updates encompass a comprehensive enhancement of coding standards and testing within a Node Express GraphQL environment. Key alterations include the introduction of new ESLint plugins for improved code quality, modifications to workflow triggers in GitHub Actions, and refinements in code handling and testing across various server components, aiming for cleaner, more efficient, and more secure code.

Changes

Files Change Summary
.eslintrc.js, package.json Enhanced ESLint configurations with new plugins and rules for better code quality.
.github/workflows/ci.yml Modified GitHub Actions trigger from pull_request to pull_request_target.
server/.../purchasedProducts.js, server/.../users.js, server/middleware/gqlAuth/index.js Simplified code by direct returns and refined function implementations.
server/gql/.../index.js, server/gql/models/.../*.js Added constants for descriptions, refactored to use variables for clarity in GraphQL schema introspection tests.
server/gql/models/tests/.../*.test.js, server/middleware/gqlAuth/tests/index.test.js, server/services/tests/slack.test.js Streamlined testing by using constants and direct mocking implementations.

🐰✨🌟✨🐰
In the burrow of code, tweaks twirl and twine,
A rabbit hops through, making all align.
With plugins and tests, the garden does thrive,
Clean, crisp, and clear, our codebase's alive!
🌱🚀🌱


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Out of diff range and nitpick comments (1)
server/middleware/gqlAuth/tests/index.test.js (1)

182-182: Consider using a more descriptive variable name than bearerPlpl.

A more descriptive name could improve readability and maintainability of the test code. For example, bearerTokenPlaceholder or dummyBearerToken might be clearer.

Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ef85f3a and 84feba3.
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • yarn.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
Files selected for processing (16)
  • .eslintrc.js (2 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/ci.yml (1 hunks)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
  • server/daos/purchasedProducts.js (2 hunks)
  • server/daos/tests/purchasedProducts.test.js (5 hunks)
  • server/database/models/users.js (1 hunks)
  • server/gql/fields/args/index.js (2 hunks)
  • server/gql/models/aggregate/purchasedProductsUtils.js (1 hunks)
  • server/gql/models/aggregate/tests/purchasedProductsUtils.test.js (1 hunks)
  • server/gql/models/tests/addresses/addresses.test.js (1 hunks)
  • server/gql/models/tests/products/products.test.js (1 hunks)
  • server/gql/models/tests/storeProducts/storeProducts.test.js (1 hunks)
  • server/gql/models/tests/supplierProducts/supplierProducts.test.js (1 hunks)
  • server/middleware/gqlAuth/index.js (2 hunks)
  • server/middleware/gqlAuth/tests/index.test.js (13 hunks)
  • server/services/tests/slack.test.js (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (7)
  • package.json
  • server/daos/purchasedProducts.js
  • server/gql/fields/args/index.js
  • server/gql/models/aggregate/tests/purchasedProductsUtils.test.js
  • server/gql/models/tests/products/products.test.js
  • server/gql/models/tests/supplierProducts/supplierProducts.test.js
  • server/services/tests/slack.test.js
Additional comments not posted (13)
server/database/models/users.js (1)

48-48: Direct return of the model definition simplifies the code and enhances readability.

.github/workflows/ci.yml (1)

4-4: The change from pull_request to pull_request_target allows workflows to access repository secrets and act on behalf of the repository. Ensure that this change is reviewed for security implications, especially if the workflow can be triggered by forks.

.eslintrc.js (3)

8-13: Enhancements to ESLint configuration with SonarJS and security plugins improve code quality checks.


14-14: Addition of new plugins for ESLint enhances the linting capabilities.


51-51: Enforcing a maximum line limit per function is a good practice to maintain readability and manage complexity.

server/gql/models/tests/addresses/addresses.test.js (1)

30-30: Using a constant for the field path in tests enhances maintainability and consistency.

server/gql/models/tests/storeProducts/storeProducts.test.js (1)

30-30: Using a constant for the field path in tests enhances maintainability and consistency.

server/gql/models/aggregate/purchasedProductsUtils.js (1)

15-22: The addition of dynamic date filtering in aggregate queries enhances flexibility and functionality.

server/daos/tests/purchasedProducts.test.js (1)

20-20: Using a constant for the mock date in tests ensures consistency and reduces the risk of errors.

server/middleware/gqlAuth/index.js (1)

49-50: Refactoring to directly return a new Promise simplifies the function and aligns with modern JavaScript practices.

server/middleware/gqlAuth/tests/index.test.js (3)

214-214: Ensure proper error handling in the mocked jsonwebtoken.verify function.

Verification successful

The error handling in the isAuthenticated function, specifically around the jsonwebtoken.verify method, is implemented correctly. The function uses a promise to handle the asynchronous verification process. Errors are appropriately caught and handled by rejecting the promise, which allows for proper error propagation and handling in the calling context. This aligns with good practices in JavaScript for managing errors in asynchronous operations.

  • Location: server/middleware/gqlAuth/index.js in the isAuthenticated function.
Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that error handling is robust in the `isAuthenticated` function.

# Test: Search for error handling patterns in `isAuthenticated`. Expect: Proper error handling.
rg --type js 'jsonwebtoken.verify' server/middleware/gqlAuth/index.js

Length of output: 69



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify the existence of the file and search for the `isAuthenticated` function.
fd 'index.js' server/middleware/gqlAuth --exec rg 'isAuthenticated' {}

Length of output: 167



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Extract the full implementation of the `isAuthenticated` function from the `index.js` file.
rg --type js --context 10 'isAuthenticated' server/middleware/gqlAuth/index.js

Length of output: 1062



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Extract more of the implementation of the `isAuthenticated` function focusing on token verification.
rg --type js --context 20 'isAuthenticated' server/middleware/gqlAuth/index.js

Length of output: 1935


224-224: Validate the use of jwtVerifySpy to ensure it captures all necessary information.


236-236: Review the logic for user authorization to ensure it aligns with security best practices.

Verification successful

The implementation of the isAuthenticated function in server/middleware/gqlAuth/index.js generally aligns with security best practices. Here are the key points:

  • Environment Checks: The function allows bypassing authentication in local and test environments, which is a common practice to facilitate development and testing.
  • Access Token Validation: It properly checks for the presence of an access token in the request headers and handles cases where it is missing by logging the issue and returning an appropriate error response.
  • Public Query Handling: The function includes a condition to allow public queries. It's recommended to review what queries are considered public to ensure that no sensitive data can be accessed without proper authentication.

Overall, the logic seems robust, but a detailed review of the public query conditions is advisable to ensure complete security compliance.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the user authorization logic in `isAuthenticated`.

# Test: Search for user authorization logic. Expect: Alignment with security best practices.
rg --type js 'isAuthenticated' server/middleware/gqlAuth/index.js

Length of output: 162



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Retrieve the full implementation of the `isAuthenticated` function.

# Test: Extract the function body to analyze its logic.
rg --type js --context 10 'export const isAuthenticated' server/middleware/gqlAuth/index.js

Length of output: 780

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant