Update Costing in Dye Desal Flowsheet

[MarcusHolly]

Fixes/Resolves:

Updates the dye desal flowsheet in preparation for a report

Changes proposed in this PR:

• Addresses how costing is handled for certain sets of configuration options
• Corrects minor typos in the flowsheet

Legal Acknowledgement

By contributing to this software project, I agree to the following terms and conditions for my contribution:

1. I agree my contributions are submitted under the license terms described in the LICENSE.txt file at the top level of this directory.
2. I represent I am authorized to make the contributions and grant the license. If my employer has rights to intellectual property that includes these contributions, I represent that I have received permission to make contributions and grant the required license on behalf of that employer.

[luohezhiming]

Is the zero order costing utilization factor same as ro.costing? Can you tell me some background why we need to use zero order costing in this flowsheet?

[MarcusHolly]

Yes, both utilization factors are set to 0.85. Zero order costing is needed to cost the ZO nanofiltration and pump models The dye_desalination_global_costing.yaml file is also linked to the zero order costing and provides values like dye_disposal_cost, recovered_water_cost, electricity_cost, etc.

[adam-a-a]

Just as a reminder for both of us--should double-check capital recovery factor values for both ZO and "detailed" costing packages and ensure that they are equivalent and line up with what was used for analyses.

[MarcusHolly]

Just as a reminder for both of us--should double-check capital recovery factor values for both ZO and "detailed" costing packages and ensure that they are equivalent and line up with what was used for analyses.

I've set the capital recovery factor for ro_costing to 0.065, which is the value used by the zo_costing and our analyses