Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Dot-ETL Project Proposal #1716
Dot-ETL Project Proposal #1716
Changes from 2 commits
c7c59b9
a465317
aa19c31
5098eab
43fdbcd
cffcac7
219f750
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Everyone can get 70+ chains right now from Google Public Datasets
I recommend you coordinate your SubQuery-based redundant effort with James @ SubQuery to make sure there is a coordinated effort that fits within a Polkadot Data Alliance bounty since its a serious undertaking to go from indexing 1 chain to covering 70+ chains, especially since the W3F does not support hosting / maintenance costs.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @sourabhniyogi thanks for your comments / review here (+ earlier review as well) . we've also reached out to you to chat offline as well. glad to see your project as part of the polkadot data alliance.
totally agreed that hosting / maintenance is a large undertaking and not covered by w3f -- our proposal here is to offer an alternative and just provide the code for the approach. hosting + maintenance and running all of the data engineering will be out of scope for this proposal. we will explore the polkadot data alliance as well.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same issue here, is that it's hard to evaluate but also, the fact that RWA parachains are prioritized. The foundation aims to remain objective and to not show preference to any individual parachain.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree with Keegan here, this is impossible to verify and typically not covered by the grants program. Please remove or rephrase.