Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improvements on the semantics #212

Draft
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Improvements on the semantics #212

wants to merge 9 commits into from

Conversation

pchampin
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

"labeled and stored" sounds very procedural compared to the rest of the definition.
Plus, "labeled" is wrong: as we are talking about abstract syntaxes, blank nodes do not have labels.
This is of course subjective, but I found the last sentence a bit haranguing
I'm pretty sure that the new wording is sufficient to imply the old wording,
and I find it simpler to understand
(I only have to check the subject, predicate and object,
the other direct constituents will follow automatically).
spec/semantics.html Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
spec/semantics.html Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
spec/semantics.html Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@TallTed
Copy link
Member

TallTed commented Dec 21, 2023

PR-Preview would be helpful.

pchampin and others added 4 commits December 22, 2023 09:07
... that it is an equivalence relation
"Q" stood for "quoted graphs", but they are now called "graph terms".
Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <[email protected]>
spec/semantics.html Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants