This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 16, 2020. It is now read-only.
Updated Ops Manager DNS entry #147
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
"pcf" is not an accurate DNS name for Ops Manager to have, for quite some time "opsman" was used in things such as `pcf-pipelines`, the new convention though is to use `ops-manager` in things such as platform automation and such so we should probably default to that instead.
|
This is a breaking change and would require to manually update the deployed Opsman to reflect the new DNS record. |
|
@vchrisb do you know of anyone re-running these templates? I.E. do you know of any cases where a "breaking change" would actually affect a customer? |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
"pcf" is not an accurate DNS name for Ops Manager to have, for quite some time "opsman" was used in things such as
pcf-pipelines, the new convention though is to useops-managerin things such as platform automation and such so we should probably default to that instead.