Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add secure mavlink #757

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 17, 2024
Merged

Add secure mavlink #757

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 17, 2024

Conversation

jnippula
Copy link

@jnippula jnippula commented Sep 4, 2024

No description provided.

@jnippula jnippula marked this pull request as draft September 4, 2024 10:15
@jnippula
Copy link
Author

jnippula commented Sep 4, 2024

Wait for boards/ssrc submodules to be merged first. Then update submodules to point "main" branch

@jnippula jnippula force-pushed the sec_mavlink branch 2 times, most recently from 57de00a to 32a2912 Compare September 4, 2024 11:44
@jnippula jnippula marked this pull request as ready for review September 12, 2024 05:58
@jnippula jnippula marked this pull request as draft September 12, 2024 07:14
@jnippula
Copy link
Author

Maybe better to not disable uxrce client altogether yet, but only when secure mavlink is active. Then we don't left any non-hardened interfaces available on the side of secmav.

@jnippula
Copy link
Author

Wait for submodules to be merged

@jnippula jnippula marked this pull request as ready for review September 16, 2024 13:15
@jnippula
Copy link
Author

Just noticed that the secure-udp-proxy module had still the feature branch version, now merged that to module main and updated px4-firmware branch for this PR. Waiting for CI build and quick verification before merging this.

@jnippula
Copy link
Author

Sec-mavlink connection verified with Saluki-v2 and QGC with reverse-proxy

@jnippula jnippula merged commit 66088df into main Sep 17, 2024
28 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants