Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If you want to write through the cache, use z_soc_uncached_ptr(). No need to pollute a cache line.
Also the volatile here is needless. You can use volatile to control compiler[1] re-ordering or removal of a memory access you want to happen. But no compiler is allowed to skip it entirely, if you write to a global variable it will be written.
[1] But not hardware! A really common mistake is trying to use volatile where you need a memory barrier instead. Obviously this is xtensa here, which is an in-order CPU. But just in general you should be really wary of volatile; it's probably not making the promises you want.