Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WIP: Add support for EKS #12

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

WIP: Add support for EKS #12

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

jfreeland
Copy link

I used kube-tmuxp for a while and loved it. I've recently started using EKS more and missed it. I'd like to see basic support for EKS added to kube-tmuxp.

This is a very rough first attempt to add some support for EKS in addition to GCP.

I have not fixed tests yet and I'm not even sure if this is how you would approach this; I just did something simple and lazy for now. If you'd like to consider adding this, I can clean it up per your feedback.

On the other hand, it scratches my itch for the moment. 🤷‍♂

Joey Freeland added 3 commits February 25, 2020 23:06
if we don't have a provider, assume it's gke
unbreak existing tests, still need to add new tests
"github.com/thecasualcoder/kube-tmuxp/pkg/filesystem"
"github.com/thecasualcoder/kube-tmuxp/pkg/kubeconfig"
"github.com/thecasualcoder/kube-tmuxp/pkg/kubetmuxp"
"github.com/jfreeland/kube-tmuxp/pkg/commander"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Imports should not be changed. Can we keep it as before ?

Copy link
Author

@jfreeland jfreeland Mar 4, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Doh! Sorry about that.

I could certainly change this and check it in as-is, but I wasn't sure if this really matched how you would want to approach this? If so, I'll clean up and push.

I think I had in mind that I should go back and by default specify that default provider is gke if no provider is specified so that it's backwards compatible.

But then again I started thinking there might be another/better ways to do this if you wanted to also add other providers.

At the time, I just did what I needed to scratch my specific itch. :)

Thoughts?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've not seen the full code. Will have a look and let you know soon

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants