Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Feat: MessageBus manager #332

Open
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Feat: MessageBus manager #332

wants to merge 7 commits into from

Conversation

ChiTimesChi
Copy link
Collaborator

@ChiTimesChi ChiTimesChi commented Sep 19, 2024 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

Description

Thin wrapper around onlyOwner methods in MessageBus, which allows to reset the failed message statuses en masse.

Checklist

  • New Contracts have been tested
  • Lint has been run
  • I have checked my code and corrected any misspellings

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced the MessageBusManager contract for enhanced management of message statuses, including the ability to reset failed messages and update message parameters.
    • Added a new interface IManageable for structured management of message transactions.
    • Implemented the IManager interface to support ownership transfer and message recovery functionalities.

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling to ensure only appropriate messages can be reset and that only authorized users can perform sensitive operations.

  • Tests

    • Developed a comprehensive test suite for the MessageBusManager to validate its functionalities and ensure reliability.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 19, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new MessageBusManager contract that provides management functionalities for a message bus system, including the handling of message statuses and failed messages. It implements interfaces for managing messages and ownership, ensuring that sensitive operations are restricted to the contract owner. Additionally, a new testing harness for the MessageBus contract is created, along with a comprehensive test suite for the MessageBusManager, validating its functionalities and access controls.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
contracts/messaging/MessageBusManager.sol Introduced MessageBusManager contract with functionalities for managing message statuses, failed messages, and ownership. Added multiple owner-restricted functions.
contracts/messaging/interfaces/IManageable.sol Added IManageable interface defining transaction status enumeration and functions for managing message transactions and gas fees.
contracts/messaging/interfaces/IManager.sol Introduced IManager interface extending IManageable, adding functions for resetting failed messages and transferring ownership.
test/messaging/MessageBusHarness.sol Created a testing harness for MessageBus, allowing manipulation of its internal state for testing purposes.
test/messaging/MessageBusManager.t.sol Developed a test suite for MessageBusManager, covering constructor validation, ownership management, and various functionalities with assertions for expected outcomes.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Owner
    participant MessageBusManager
    participant MessageBus

    Owner->>MessageBusManager: resetFailedMessages(messageIds)
    MessageBusManager->>MessageBus: validateMessageIds(messageIds)
    MessageBus->>MessageBusManager: return validationResult
    MessageBusManager->>MessageBus: updateMessageStatus(messageId, null)
    MessageBus-->>MessageBusManager: confirmation
    MessageBusManager-->>Owner: confirmation
Loading

🐰 In the meadow where bunnies play,
New contracts hop in bright array!
With messages managed, all in line,
Ownership shifts, all's just fine.
A testing harness, oh so neat,
Ensures our code is quick and sweet!
🐇✨

Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 193f470 and 6d71a7e.

Files selected for processing (5)
  • contracts/messaging/MessageBusManager.sol (1 hunks)
  • contracts/messaging/interfaces/IManageable.sol (1 hunks)
  • contracts/messaging/interfaces/IManager.sol (1 hunks)
  • test/messaging/MessageBusHarness.sol (1 hunks)
  • test/messaging/MessageBusManager.t.sol (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (26)
contracts/messaging/interfaces/IManager.sol (1)

6-10: LGTM!

The IManager interface is well-defined and extends the IManageable interface correctly. The two new functions, resetFailedMessages and transferMessageBusOwnership, provide essential management capabilities for the messaging system.

The function declarations follow best practices:

  • They are declared as external, which is suitable for interface functions.
  • The parameter names and types are clear and descriptive.
  • The resetFailedMessages function accepts an array of message IDs, enabling bulk resetting of failed messages.
  • The transferMessageBusOwnership function allows for secure transfer of message bus ownership.

Overall, the interface enhances the management functionalities of the messaging system effectively.

test/messaging/MessageBusHarness.sol (3)

8-8: LGTM!

The constructor correctly initializes the parent MessageBus contract with the provided addresses for gas fee pricing and an authorization verifier.

10-12: Testing utility function.

The setMessageStatus function is a testing utility that allows for controlled manipulation of the message status during testing. It should not be used in production.

14-16: Testing utility function.

The setFees function is a testing utility that allows for controlled manipulation of the fee structure during testing. It should not be used in production.

contracts/messaging/interfaces/IManageable.sol (1)

4-22: LGTM!

The IManageable interface is well-structured and provides a comprehensive set of functionalities for managing message transactions. The inclusion of the TxStatus enum allows for clear tracking of transaction outcomes, while the external functions enable effective management of various aspects such as message status, authentication, gas fees, and gas pricing.

The interface follows Solidity naming conventions and establishes a structured approach to managing message transactions, enhancing the functionality and control within the smart contract ecosystem.

contracts/messaging/MessageBusManager.sol (9)

14-20: LGTM!

The constructor implementation follows best practices:

  • Checks for zero addresses to prevent misconfiguration.
  • Uses a custom error for the revert condition, which is gas-efficient.
  • Sets the MESSAGE_BUS as an immutable variable to save gas.
  • Transfers ownership to the provided address for access control.

22-30: LGTM!

The resetFailedMessages function implementation is secure and efficient:

  • Restricted to the owner for access control.
  • Checks if the message status is "Fail" before resetting to prevent accidental changes.
  • Uses a custom error for the revert condition, which is gas-efficient.
  • Updates the message status via the MESSAGE_BUS contract for consistency.

34-36: LGTM!

The updateMessageStatus function implementation is secure:

  • Restricted to the owner for access control.
  • Updates the message status via the MESSAGE_BUS contract for consistency.

38-40: LGTM!

The updateAuthVerifier function implementation is secure:

  • Restricted to the owner for access control.
  • Updates the verifier address via the MESSAGE_BUS contract for consistency.

42-44: LGTM!

The withdrawGasFees function implementation is secure:

  • Restricted to the owner for access control.
  • Withdraws the gas fees via the MESSAGE_BUS contract for consistency.

46-48: LGTM!

The rescueGas function implementation is secure:

  • Restricted to the owner for access control.
  • Rescues the gas via the MESSAGE_BUS contract for consistency.

50-52: LGTM!

The updateGasFeePricing function implementation is secure:

  • Restricted to the owner for access control.
  • Updates the pricing address via the MESSAGE_BUS contract for consistency.

54-56: LGTM!

The transferMessageBusOwnership function implementation is secure:

  • Restricted to the owner for access control.
  • Transfers the ownership via the MESSAGE_BUS contract for consistency.

58-60: LGTM!

The getExecutedMessage function implementation is correct:

  • Allows anyone to check the status of a message.
  • Retrieves the message status via the MESSAGE_BUS contract for consistency.
test/messaging/MessageBusManager.t.sol (12)

24-28: LGTM!

The setUp function correctly initializes the test environment by creating the necessary contract instances and transferring ownership as expected.

30-36: LGTM!

The assertEq functions provide a clean way to compare TxStatus enums in the tests by casting them to uint8. This is a valid approach for enum comparison.

38-47: LGTM!

The toArray function is a simple utility that correctly creates a bytes32[] array from three bytes32 arguments. It is appropriately marked as pure since it does not interact with the contract state.

49-52: LGTM!

The test_constructor function correctly verifies that the constructor of the MessageBusManager contract initializes the MESSAGE_BUS and owner state variables with the expected values.

54-57: LGTM!

The test_constructor_revert_zeroMessageBus function properly tests the constructor of the MessageBusManager contract with a zero address for the messageBus_ parameter. It correctly verifies that the constructor reverts with the expected MessageBusManager__ZeroAddress error.

59-62: LGTM!

The test_constructor_revert_zeroOwner function properly tests the constructor of the MessageBusManager contract with a zero address for the owner_ parameter. It correctly verifies that the constructor reverts with the expected MessageBusManager__ZeroAddress error.

64-68: LGTM!

The test_updateMessageStatus_success function properly tests the updateMessageStatus function of the MessageBusManager contract with a Success status. It correctly calls the function as the owner and verifies that the message status is updated correctly in the MessageBusHarness instance.

70-74: LGTM!

The test_updateMessageStatus_fail function properly tests the updateMessageStatus function of the MessageBusManager contract with a Fail status. It correctly calls the function as the owner and verifies that the message status is updated correctly in the MessageBusHarness instance.

76-81: LGTM!

The test_updateMessageStatus_null function properly tests the updateMessageStatus function of the MessageBusManager contract with a Null status. It correctly sets the initial message status to Fail, calls the function as the owner with a Null status, and verifies that the message status is updated correctly to Null in the MessageBusHarness instance.

83-88: LGTM!

The test_updateMessageStatus_revert_callerNotOwner function properly tests the access control of the updateMessageStatus function of the MessageBusManager contract. It correctly assumes that the caller is not the owner, expects the function call to revert, and calls the function as the caller.

90-94: LGTM!

The test_updateAuthVerifier function properly tests the updateAuthVerifier function of the MessageBusManager contract. It correctly calls the function as the owner with a new address and verifies that the authVerifier variable in the MessageBusHarness instance is updated correctly.

96-101: LGTM!

The test_updateAuthVerifier_revert_callerNotOwner function properly tests the access control of the updateAuthVerifier function of the `

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 10939992031

Details

  • 0 of 16 (0.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage decreased (-0.04%) to 12.813%
Changes Missing Coverage Covered Lines Changed/Added Lines %
contracts/messaging/MessageBusManager.sol 0 16 0.0%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 10489777082: -0.04%
Covered Lines: 664
Relevant Lines: 4730
💛 - Coveralls

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@ChiTimesChi @coveralls