Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/b val uncertainty #43

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Jul 26, 2023
Merged

Feature/b val uncertainty #43

merged 11 commits into from
Jul 26, 2023

Conversation

aronsho
Copy link
Collaborator

@aronsho aronsho commented Jul 12, 2023

No description provided.

@aronsho aronsho requested a review from adzubay July 12, 2023 13:59
adzubay
adzubay previously approved these changes Jul 13, 2023
Copy link
Collaborator

@adzubay adzubay left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks and works great! We can ask others if more clarification on b vs beta values is needed, but I think it's fine.

@aronsho aronsho requested a review from schmidni July 14, 2023 16:05
weights: Optional[list] = None,
gutenberg: bool = False,
error: bool = False
) -> (float, float):
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@schmidni the output is either just a float or a tuple(float, float), depending on the parameter gutemberg. Is this hinted correctly?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Union[float, Tuple[float, float]]?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Union[float, Tuple[float, float]]?

correct.

@aronsho aronsho requested a review from adzubay July 14, 2023 16:07
@aronsho
Copy link
Collaborator Author

aronsho commented Jul 14, 2023

@adzubay I included the uncertainty in the estimate_beta_tinti function, can you check if it works?

Copy link
Collaborator

@adzubay adzubay left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Uncertainty addition in estimate_beta functions worked well for me!

@aronsho aronsho merged commit 751a661 into main Jul 26, 2023
1 check passed
@aronsho aronsho deleted the feature/b_val_uncertainty branch July 26, 2023 10:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants