test and schema update for toplevel mask #2085
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
kostmo
force-pushed
the
scenario/toplevel-mask
branch
from
0980e14
to
a23803a
Compare
kostmo
force-pushed
the
scenario/toplevel-mask
branch
from
a23803a
to
6711287
Compare
kostmo
changed the title
byorgey
approved these changes
Jul 29, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Also updated the schema to reflect availability of the
maskproperty at the toplevel (since #2071).The
maskproperty for indicating transparency in structure overlays has existed since #1332. In structure overlays, themaskis semantically different than ablankterrain cell.