fix code smells and update readme #146
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes include updates to the ByteMeBurger API's documentation and codebase, focusing on enhancing the Changes
Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Files selected for processing (1)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Domain/Entities/Payment.cs (1)
11-11: Consider using a more appropriate default value for thePaymentTypeproperty.Initializing the
PaymentTypeproperty with a default value is a good practice to ensure a valid state for new instances and prevent null reference issues. However, usingPaymentType.Testas the default value might not be appropriate for a production environment.Consider using a more appropriate default value, such as
PaymentType.UnknownorPaymentType.NotSpecified, to indicate that the payment type has not been explicitly set.src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.MercadoPago.Gateway/MercadoPagoService.cs (2)
Line range hint
71-88: Consider making the guest email configurable.Using a default email for guest customers is a valid approach. However, the email is currently hardcoded. Consider making it configurable, perhaps through the
MercadoPagoOptionsclass.private readonly string _guestEmail; public MercadoPagoService(MercadoPagoOptions mercadoPagoOptions, ILogger<MercadoPagoService> logger) { // ... _guestEmail = mercadoPagoOptions.GuestEmail ?? "[email protected]"; } // ... var paymentPayerRequest = order.Customer is null ? new PaymentPayerRequest { Email = _guestEmail, } : MapPaymentPayerRequest(order);The method follows good practices:
- Encapsulates the payment request construction logic, adhering to the Single Responsibility Principle.
- Uses separate methods to map domain entities to the API request, utilizing the Anticorruption Layer pattern.
113-113: Remove the unnecessary null-forgiving operator.The null-forgiving operator (
!) is used onorder, but it's unlikely thatorderwould be null here as it's always passed as a non-null value from theGetPaymentCreateRequestmethod. Consider removing the operator to improve code clarity.private static PaymentPayerRequest MapPaymentPayerRequest(Order order) => new() { Email = order.Customer.Email, // ... };The method exhibits good practices:
- It's a pure function that maps the domain entity to the API request, promoting testability.
- Encapsulates the mapping logic, following the Single Responsibility Principle.
- Utilizes the Anticorruption Layer pattern by isolating the domain from infrastructure concerns.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
aws-infra-phase-3.pngis excluded by!**/*.png
Files selected for processing (21)
- README.md (3 hunks)
- postman/TechChallenge - Workflow testing.postman_collection.json (1 hunks)
- postman/TechChallenge.postman_environment.json (1 hunks)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Api/Controllers/CustomersController.cs (1 hunks)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Api/DomainEventsHandler.cs (1 hunks)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Api/GlobalExceptionHandler.cs (1 hunks)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Api/Model/Customers/CreateCustomerRequest.cs (1 hunks)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Api/Model/Products/CreateProductRequest.cs (1 hunks)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Controllers/Dto/CustomerDto.cs (1 hunks)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Domain/Entities/Payment.cs (1 hunks)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.MercadoPago.Gateway/Configuration/MercadoPagoOptions.cs (1 hunks)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.MercadoPago.Gateway/MercadoPagoService.cs (3 hunks)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.MercadoPago.Gateway/Model/MercadoPagoWebhookEvent.cs (2 hunks)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Persistence/Dto/OrderItemDto.cs (1 hunks)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Persistence/Dto/OrderListDto.cs (1 hunks)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Persistence/Dto/ProductDto.cs (1 hunks)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Persistence/Repository/OrderRepositoryDapper.cs (3 hunks)
- tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Api.Test/Controllers/OrdersControllerTest.cs (1 hunks)
- tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application.Test/DomainServices/OrderTrackingCodeServiceTest.cs (1 hunks)
- tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Controllers.Test/CustomerServiceTests.cs (0 hunks)
- tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Controllers.Test/PaymentServiceTests.cs (1 hunks)
Files not reviewed due to no reviewable changes (1)
- tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Controllers.Test/CustomerServiceTests.cs
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Api/GlobalExceptionHandler.cs
- tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Api.Test/Controllers/OrdersControllerTest.cs
- tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application.Test/DomainServices/OrderTrackingCodeServiceTest.cs
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (14)
src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Api/Controllers/CustomersController.cs (1)
Pattern
**/*.cs: Validate all files and structures against Domain Driven Design, SOLID and Clean Architecture principles.src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Api/DomainEventsHandler.cs (1)
Pattern
**/*.cs: Validate all files and structures against Domain Driven Design, SOLID and Clean Architecture principles.src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Api/Model/Customers/CreateCustomerRequest.cs (1)
Pattern
**/*.cs: Validate all files and structures against Domain Driven Design, SOLID and Clean Architecture principles.src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Api/Model/Products/CreateProductRequest.cs (1)
Pattern
**/*.cs: Validate all files and structures against Domain Driven Design, SOLID and Clean Architecture principles.src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Controllers/Dto/CustomerDto.cs (1)
Pattern
**/*.cs: Validate all files and structures against Domain Driven Design, SOLID and Clean Architecture principles.src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Domain/Entities/Payment.cs (1)
Pattern
**/*.cs: Validate all files and structures against Domain Driven Design, SOLID and Clean Architecture principles.src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.MercadoPago.Gateway/Configuration/MercadoPagoOptions.cs (1)
Pattern
**/*.cs: Validate all files and structures against Domain Driven Design, SOLID and Clean Architecture principles.src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.MercadoPago.Gateway/MercadoPagoService.cs (1)
Pattern
**/*.cs: Validate all files and structures against Domain Driven Design, SOLID and Clean Architecture principles.src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.MercadoPago.Gateway/Model/MercadoPagoWebhookEvent.cs (1)
Pattern
**/*.cs: Validate all files and structures against Domain Driven Design, SOLID and Clean Architecture principles.src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Persistence/Dto/OrderItemDto.cs (1)
Pattern
**/*.cs: Validate all files and structures against Domain Driven Design, SOLID and Clean Architecture principles.src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Persistence/Dto/OrderListDto.cs (1)
Pattern
**/*.cs: Validate all files and structures against Domain Driven Design, SOLID and Clean Architecture principles.src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Persistence/Dto/ProductDto.cs (1)
Pattern
**/*.cs: Validate all files and structures against Domain Driven Design, SOLID and Clean Architecture principles.src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Persistence/Repository/OrderRepositoryDapper.cs (1)
Pattern
**/*.cs: Validate all files and structures against Domain Driven Design, SOLID and Clean Architecture principles.tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Controllers.Test/PaymentServiceTests.cs (1)
Pattern
**/*.cs: Validate all files and structures against Domain Driven Design, SOLID and Clean Architecture principles.
LanguageTool
README.md
[uncategorized] ~11-~11: It seems likely that a singular genitive (’s) apostrophe is missing.
Context: ...un on EKS Cluster inside a private VPC, Customers enpoint will be deprecated or splited i...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_APOSTROPHE_S_XS)
Additional comments not posted (28)
src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Persistence/Dto/OrderListDto.cs (1)
9-9: Consider if allowing null values for theTrackingCodeproperty aligns with the business requirements and the overall design of theOrderListDtoclass.While initializing the
TrackingCodeproperty withnull!makes the intended usage clearer to developers, it's important to consider if allowing null values aligns with the business requirements and the overall design of theOrderListDtoclass.If the
TrackingCodeis an essential part of an order, it might be better to enforce a non-null value and handle the absence of a tracking code differently, such as using an empty string or a special value to indicate the absence of a tracking code.Allowing null values could lead to unexpected behavior or null reference exceptions if not handled properly in other parts of the codebase.
To verify the impact of allowing null values for the
TrackingCodeproperty, run the following script:src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.MercadoPago.Gateway/Configuration/MercadoPagoOptions.cs (2)
13-13: LGTM!The changes to the
WebhookSecretproperty are consistent and align with the goal of enhancing type safety:
- The
null!syntax ensures that the property is non-nullable at runtime.- The
[Required]attribute indicates that the property is mandatory.- The
[MinLength(1)]attribute ensures that the property value has a minimum length of 1.These changes effectively prevent potential null reference exceptions and enforce the expected behavior of the property.
17-17: LGTM!The changes to the
AccessTokenproperty are consistent and align with the goal of enhancing type safety, similar to the changes made to theWebhookSecretproperty:
- The
null!syntax ensures that the property is non-nullable at runtime.- The
[Required]attribute indicates that the property is mandatory.- The
[MinLength(1)]attribute ensures that the property value has a minimum length of 1.These changes effectively prevent potential null reference exceptions and enforce the expected behavior of the property.
src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Api/Model/Customers/CreateCustomerRequest.cs (1)
26-26: Great use of non-nullable reference types and validation attributes!The initialization of the
Cpfproperty withnull!enforces stricter nullability checks and improves type safety. This change reduces the risk of null reference exceptions and enhances code reliability.The
[Required]and[MaxLength(14)]attributes ensure data integrity by validating that theCpfproperty is set and has a maximum length of 14 characters. These attributes provide clear error messages to the client if the validation fails.The
CreateCustomerRequestrecord follows the Clean Architecture principles by being a simple DTO without any behavior. It adheres to the Single Responsibility Principle by only being responsible for data transfer.src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.MercadoPago.Gateway/Model/MercadoPagoWebhookEvent.cs (3)
10-10: LGTM! The change aligns with SOLID principles.The modification to include
= null!;for theApiVersionproperty enforces non-null constraints, which can help prevent potential null reference exceptions during runtime. This change aligns with the Single Responsibility Principle (SRP) by ensuring that the class has a single responsibility of representing a validMercadoPagoWebhookEvent, and the Interface Segregation Principle (ISP) by ensuring that the class provides a clear and specific interface for its properties.
22-22: LGTM! The change aligns with SOLID principles.The modification to include
= null!;for theTypeproperty enforces non-null constraints, which can help prevent potential null reference exceptions during runtime. This change aligns with the Single Responsibility Principle (SRP) by ensuring that the class has a single responsibility of representing a validMercadoPagoWebhookEvent, and the Interface Segregation Principle (ISP) by ensuring that the class provides a clear and specific interface for its properties.
30-30: LGTM! The change aligns with SOLID principles.The modification to include
= null!;for theIdproperty enforces non-null constraints, which can help prevent potential null reference exceptions during runtime. This change aligns with the Single Responsibility Principle (SRP) by ensuring that the class has a single responsibility of representing a validMercadoPagoWebhookData, and the Interface Segregation Principle (ISP) by ensuring that the class provides a clear and specific interface for its properties.src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Controllers/Dto/CustomerDto.cs (1)
15-15: LGTM!The change to initialize the
Cpfproperty with a null-forgiving operator enhances the type safety of the code by enforcing non-nullability. This aligns with the coding guidelines and reduces the risk of null reference exceptions at runtime.The change does not introduce any violations of Domain Driven Design, SOLID or Clean Architecture principles.
src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Domain/Entities/Payment.cs (1)
8-8: Verify that all existing usages of theTypeproperty have been updated.Marking the
Typeproperty as[Obsolete]is a good practice to discourage its usage in future code. However, it's important to ensure that all existing usages of this property have been updated to use the new alternative.Run the following script to verify the usage of the
Typeproperty:Verification successful
The obsolete
Typeproperty is not being used in the codebase.The codebase has been successfully migrated to use the
PaymentTypeenum instead of the obsoleteTypeproperty. No usages ofPayment.Typeorpayment.Typewere found in the codebase. ThePaymentTypeenum is consistently used throughout the payment-related code for handling payment types.It's safe to remove the obsolete
Typeproperty from thePaymentclass in a future refactoring, as it's no longer being used.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the `Type` property is not used in the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of the `Type` property. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type cs -w $'Type'Length of output: 1118
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for usages of the obsolete Payment.Type property # Search for "Payment.Type" in C# files echo "Searching for Payment.Type usage:" rg --type cs 'Payment\.Type' # Search for "payment.Type" (lowercase) in C# files echo -e "\nSearching for payment.Type usage:" rg --type cs 'payment\.Type'Length of output: 221
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for usages of the Payment class # Search for "Payment" in C# files, excluding the Payment.cs file itself echo "Searching for Payment class usage:" rg --type cs -g '!Payment.cs' '\bPayment\b' -C 2 # Search for "payment" (lowercase) in C# files, excluding the Payment.cs file echo -e "\nSearching for 'payment' usage:" rg --type cs -g '!Payment.cs' '\bpayment\b' -C 2Length of output: 83261
src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Api/Model/Products/CreateProductRequest.cs (1)
42-46: LGTM!The change in method visibility from
publictointernaladheres to the principle of least privilege, which is a good practice. The method is a simple mapping function that converts the request to a domain model, which aligns with Clean Architecture principles. It does not violate any SOLID principles and has no apparent issues with the logic or syntax.postman/TechChallenge.postman_environment.json (7)
72-75: LGTM!The
jwt_audkey-value pair is correctly defined, representing the JWT audience claim. Ensure that the server-side code properly validates this claim when verifying the token to confirm it is intended for the current application.
78-81: LGTM!The
jwt_isskey-value pair is correctly defined, representing the JWT issuer claim. Ensure that the server-side code properly validates this claim when verifying the token to confirm it is issued by a trusted source.
102-105: Verify the security of thejwt_secretvalue.The
jwt_secretkey-value pair represents the secret key used for signing and verifying the integrity of the JWT. It is crucial to keep this value confidential and ensure it is not exposed in public repositories or client-side code. Please double-check that the secret key is securely stored and managed.
108-111: Verify the handling and security of theadmin_cpfvalue.The
admin_cpfkey-value pair seems to represent the CPF identifier for an admin user. If this value corresponds to real user data, ensure that it is handled securely and in compliance with relevant privacy regulations. Consider using a placeholder or test value if this is not a production environment.
114-117: Verify the handling and security of thekitchen_cpfvalue.The
kitchen_cpfkey-value pair seems to represent the CPF identifier for a kitchen user or staff member. If this value corresponds to real user data, ensure that it is handled securely and in compliance with relevant privacy regulations. Consider using a placeholder or test value if this is not a production environment.
120-123: Verify the handling and security of thecustomer_cpfvalue.The
customer_cpfkey-value pair seems to represent the CPF identifier for a customer user. If this value corresponds to real user data, ensure that it is handled securely and in compliance with relevant privacy regulations. Consider using a placeholder or test value if this is not a production environment.
126-129: Verify the handling of user roles and permissions.The
profilekey-value pair is set toadmin, indicating the user role for the Postman collection. Ensure that the application properly handles user roles and permissions based on this value, and that the necessary access controls are in place to restrict access to sensitive resources or operations.tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Controllers.Test/PaymentServiceTests.cs (2)
30-30: LGTM!The change from a private readonly field to a local variable for
mockUpdateOrderPaymentUseCaseis a good refactoring that improves encapsulation and adheres to the Single Responsibility Principle. By reducing the visibility of the mock object, the class becomes more focused on its primary purpose.
37-37: LGTM!The constructor update to use the local variable
mockUpdateOrderPaymentUseCaseis a necessary change to match the refactoring of the mock object. The change is implemented correctly and maintains the functionality of the constructor.src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Api/DomainEventsHandler.cs (1)
114-114: LGTM!Calling
GC.SuppressFinalize(this)in theDisposemethod is a good practice that aligns with the Dispose pattern. It can help optimize garbage collection by explicitly indicating that this object does not need finalization. The change enhances resource management without any apparent issues or side effects.README.md (3)
5-6: Great addition of SonarCloud badges!The coverage and quality gate status badges provide valuable insights into the project's testing coverage and code quality at a glance. They enhance the documentation and give readers a quick overview of the project's health.
26-29: Nice addition of the "Dependencies" section!Documenting the project's dependencies, such as the VPC and Database repositories, is a good practice. It provides additional context for users and helps them understand the infrastructure setup required for the project.
141-143: Great addition of the architecture diagram!The architecture diagram is a valuable addition to the documentation. It illustrates the infrastructure setup for the project and provides a visual representation of the system's design, enhancing the overall understanding of the project's architecture.
src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.MercadoPago.Gateway/MercadoPagoService.cs (1)
Line range hint
142-158: Good use of a static method for the pure mapping function.Marking the
MapPaymentCreateRequestmethod asstaticis a good decision as it's a pure function that doesn't access any instance members of the class. Static methods are ideal for utility functions like this that don't maintain state.The method demonstrates solid practices:
- It's a pure function that maps domain entities and parameters to the API request, promoting testability.
- Encapsulates the mapping logic, following the Single Responsibility Principle.
- Utilizes the Anticorruption Layer pattern by isolating the domain from infrastructure concerns.
src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Persistence/Repository/OrderRepositoryDapper.cs (3)
124-124: LGTM!The change from
Any()toCount > 0improves code clarity by explicitly conveying the intent of checking if the dictionary has any elements.
149-149: LGTM!The change simplifies the error logging statement and improves readability by logging the exception as a parameter. This is a common and recommended practice.
175-175: LGTM!The change is consistent with the previous logging statement change. It simplifies the error logging statement and improves readability by logging the exception as a parameter.
postman/TechChallenge - Workflow testing.postman_collection.json (1)
983-992: LGTM!The prerequest script enhances the flexibility and usability of the collection by dynamically adding the CPF header based on the
profileenvironment variable. The logic is correct and the logging messages provide useful information about the request being made.
| @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ internal class OrderItemDto | |||
| { | |||
| public Guid OrderId { get; set; } | |||
| public Guid ProductId { get; set; } | |||
| public string ProductName { get; set; } | |||
| public string ProductName { get; set; } = null!; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider alternative approaches to ensure non-nullability.
Initializing the ProductName property to null! is not a common practice and may cause confusion. If the property is intended to be non-nullable, consider the following alternatives:
- Initialize the property with a non-null default value, such as an empty string:
public string ProductName { get; set; } = string.Empty;- Mark the property as required using a constructor:
public class OrderItemDto
{
// ...
public string ProductName { get; set; }
public OrderItemDto(/* other parameters */, string productName)
{
// ...
ProductName = productName;
}
}- Use a validation framework, such as FluentValidation, to ensure that the property is not null when the object is created or updated.
| namespace FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Persistence.Dto; | ||
|
|
||
| public class ProductDto | ||
| { | ||
| public Guid Id { get; set; } | ||
|
|
||
| public string Name { get; set; } | ||
| public string Name { get; set; } = null!; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid using null-forgiving operator for non-nullable reference types.
The null! initialization is a null-forgiving operator that suppresses the compiler warning for the non-nullable reference type when assigning null. However, it doesn't actually prevent null assignment and can still lead to null reference exceptions at runtime.
It's better to enforce non-nullability through constructors or factory methods to ensure the Name property is always assigned a valid value.
Consider applying this diff to remove the null! initialization and enforce non-nullability through the constructor:
public class ProductDto
{
public Guid Id { get; set; }
- public string Name { get; set; } = null!;
+ public string Name { get; set; }
public string Description { get; set; }
public int Category { get; set; }
public decimal Price { get; set; }
public string Images { get; set; }
public DateTime Created { get; set; }
public DateTime? Updated { get; set; }
- public ProductDto()
+ public ProductDto(string name)
{
+ Name = name;
}
}Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| "key": "jwt_iat", | ||
| "value": "123123", | ||
| "type": "default", | ||
| "enabled": true |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use a valid Unix timestamp for the jwt_iat value.
The jwt_iat key-value pair represents the JWT issued at claim. However, the current value 123123 does not seem to be a valid Unix timestamp. Please update it to a number containing the number of seconds from 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z UTC until the desired issued at date/time.
| "key": "jwt_exp", | ||
| "value": "", | ||
| "type": "any", | ||
| "enabled": true |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Provide a valid Unix timestamp for the jwt_exp value.
The jwt_exp key-value pair represents the JWT expiration time claim. The current value is an empty string, which is not valid. Please update it to a number containing the number of seconds from 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z UTC until the desired expiration date/time.
| @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ namespace FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Api.Controllers; | |||
| /// </summary> | |||
| /// <param name="customerService">Customer service (port implementation).</param> | |||
| /// <param name="logger">Logger</param> | |||
| [Obsolete("To be migrated to different project")] | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider refactoring the controller to follow SOLID principles
The [Obsolete] attribute is a good way to communicate that the controller is being migrated to a different project. However, the controller has the following SOLID principle violations:
-
Single Responsibility Principle (SRP): The controller is handling multiple concerns (customers and orders) based on the method names. Consider splitting the controller into smaller, more focused controllers that handle a single responsibility.
-
Dependency Inversion Principle (DIP): The controller is tightly coupled to the
ICustomerServiceandILoggerimplementations. Consider using constructor injection and depending on abstractions (interfaces) instead of concrete implementations. -
Interface Segregation Principle (ISP): The controller depends on the
ICustomerServiceinterface which may contain methods that the controller does not use. Consider creating smaller, more specific interfaces that the controller depends on.
Refactoring the controller to follow SOLID principles will make it more maintainable, testable, and easier to evolve over time.
README.md
Outdated
| ## Description | ||
| This repository contains the source code for the ByteMeBurger API, part of the FIAP Tech Challenge. The API is designed to manage a burger restaurant's operations, including order placement, customer registration, and product management. The recent updates introduce a new endpoint for customer registration and enhance various aspects of the application, such as error handling, data models, and service configurations. | ||
|
|
||
| Endpoints are protected since JWT token is now required. Since this application will run on EKS Cluster inside a private VPC, Customers enpoint will be deprecated or splited into a different service. Customers information can be extracted from token, since it's generated and validated internally. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Documentation update looks good, but please fix the typo.
The documentation update regarding the shift towards JWT token-based authentication and the potential deprecation or splitting of the Customers endpoint aligns well with the architectural changes of running the application in an EKS Cluster within a private VPC. Extracting customer information from the JWT token is a good approach in this context.
However, please fix the typo identified by the static analysis hint:
- "Customers enpoint" should be "Customers endpoint"
Tools
LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~11-~11: It seems likely that a singular genitive (’s) apostrophe is missing.
Context: ...un on EKS Cluster inside a private VPC, Customers enpoint will be deprecated or splited i...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_APOSTROPHE_S_XS)
| ExternalReference = mercadoPagoPayment!.Id.ToString(), | ||
| OrderId = order.Id, | ||
| Amount = paymentCreateRequest.TransactionAmount.Value | ||
| Amount = paymentCreateRequest!.TransactionAmount.Value |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use caution with the null-forgiving operator.
The null-forgiving operator (!) is used on mercadoPagoPayment and paymentCreateRequest. While this suppresses compiler warnings, it can lead to runtime null reference exceptions if the values are actually null. Consider adding explicit null checks instead.
if (mercadoPagoPayment is null)
{
throw new InvalidOperationException("MercadoPago payment creation failed.");
}
if (paymentCreateRequest is null)
{
throw new InvalidOperationException("Payment create request is null.");
}On a positive note, the method adheres to the SOLID principles and DDD patterns:
- Implements the
IPaymentGatewayinterface, following the Dependency Inversion Principle. - Has a single responsibility of creating a payment, aligning with the Single Responsibility Principle.
- Maps the domain
Orderentity to the MercadoPago API request/response, utilizing the Anticorruption Layer pattern.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
tf/main.tf (1)
267-270: Consider removing commented-out code for a cleaner codebase.The annotations related to AWS load balancer configurations are commented out. If they are no longer needed, it's best to remove them to maintain code cleanliness and readability. If they might be required in the future, consider documenting their purpose elsewhere.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (19)
- kubernetes/deployment-api.yaml (2 hunks)
- kubernetes/deployment-db.yaml (1 hunks)
- kubernetes/deployment-seq.yaml (1 hunks)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Api/Model/Customers/CreateCustomerRequest.cs (1 hunks)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application/UseCases/Payment/UpdatePaymentStatusUseCase.cs (0 hunks)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Controllers/Dto/CustomerDto.cs (1 hunks)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Domain/ValueObjects/Cpf.cs (1 hunks)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.MercadoPago.Gateway/MercadoPagoService.cs (4 hunks)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.MercadoPago.Gateway/Model/MercadoPagoWebhookEvent.cs (2 hunks)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Persistence/Dto/OrderItemDto.cs (1 hunks)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Persistence/Dto/OrderListDto.cs (1 hunks)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Persistence/Dto/ProductDto.cs (1 hunks)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Persistence/MySqlDbContext.cs (1 hunks)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Publisher.Sqs/ServiceExtensions.cs (1 hunks)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Publisher.Sqs/SqsSettings.cs (2 hunks)
- tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application.Test/UseCases/Payment/UpdatePaymentStatusUseCaseTest.cs (2 hunks)
- tf/.terraform.lock.hcl (1 hunks)
- tf/main.tf (4 hunks)
- tf/variables.tf (1 hunks)
Files not reviewed due to no reviewable changes (1)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application/UseCases/Payment/UpdatePaymentStatusUseCase.cs
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Publisher.Sqs/ServiceExtensions.cs
- tf/.terraform.lock.hcl
- tf/variables.tf
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (7)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Api/Model/Customers/CreateCustomerRequest.cs
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Controllers/Dto/CustomerDto.cs
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.MercadoPago.Gateway/MercadoPagoService.cs
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.MercadoPago.Gateway/Model/MercadoPagoWebhookEvent.cs
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Persistence/Dto/OrderItemDto.cs
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Persistence/Dto/OrderListDto.cs
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Persistence/Dto/ProductDto.cs
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (4)
src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Domain/ValueObjects/Cpf.cs (1)
Pattern
**/*.cs: Validate all files and structures against Domain Driven Design, SOLID and Clean Architecture principles.src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Persistence/MySqlDbContext.cs (1)
Pattern
**/*.cs: Validate all files and structures against Domain Driven Design, SOLID and Clean Architecture principles.src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Publisher.Sqs/SqsSettings.cs (1)
Pattern
**/*.cs: Validate all files and structures against Domain Driven Design, SOLID and Clean Architecture principles.tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application.Test/UseCases/Payment/UpdatePaymentStatusUseCaseTest.cs (1)
Pattern
**/*.cs: Validate all files and structures against Domain Driven Design, SOLID and Clean Architecture principles.
Additional comments not posted (15)
src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Publisher.Sqs/SqsSettings.cs (4)
11-11: LGTM!Initializing the
QueueNameproperty tostring.Emptyis a good practice to avoid null reference exceptions and improve code readability. This change aligns with the coding guideline to ensure properties are initialized to non-null values.
21-21: LGTM!Initializing the
Regionproperty tostring.Emptyis a good practice to avoid null reference exceptions and improve code readability. This change aligns with the coding guideline to ensure properties are initialized to non-null values.
26-26: LGTM!Initializing the
ClientSecretproperty tostring.Emptyis a good practice to avoid null reference exceptions and improve code readability. This change aligns with the coding guideline to ensure properties are initialized to non-null values.
31-31: LGTM!Initializing the
ClientIdproperty tostring.Emptyis a good practice to avoid null reference exceptions and improve code readability. This change aligns with the coding guideline to ensure properties are initialized to non-null values.src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Persistence/MySqlDbContext.cs (2)
2-2: LGTM!The using directive is required to use the
[ExcludeFromCodeCoverage]attribute and is correctly added.
9-9: Excluding the persistence layer class from code coverage is a common practice.The
[ExcludeFromCodeCoverage]attribute is correctly applied to theMySqlDbContextclass. It is a common practice to exclude persistence layer classes from code coverage analysis as they are typically difficult to test and are not part of the core business logic.kubernetes/deployment-seq.yaml (1)
18-18: Verify that the application does not require the service account token.Disabling the automatic mounting of the service account token is a good security practice. However, please ensure that the application running in the container does not rely on the service account token for accessing the Kubernetes API. If it does, this change may break that functionality.
kubernetes/deployment-db.yaml (1)
18-18: Verify if the application requires the service account token.Setting
automountServiceAccountTokentofalseis a good security practice to prevent unnecessary exposure of the service account token to the container.However, please ensure that the application running in the container does not rely on the service account token for accessing the Kubernetes API. If it does, you might need to update the configuration to mount the token or use an alternative authentication mechanism.
tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application.Test/UseCases/Payment/UpdatePaymentStatusUseCaseTest.cs (2)
27-27: LGTM!The change in payment status from
PaymentStatus.PaidtoPaymentStatus.Approvedaligns with the AI-generated summary and appears to be a valid update to the test case.
41-42: LGTM!The update to the verification step for
_mockUpdateOrderStatusUseCasealigns with the AI-generated summary. The change enhances the specificity of the verification process by ensuring that theExecutemethod is called with anyGuidand anyOrderStatus, which is an improvement over simply verifying that the method was called.kubernetes/deployment-api.yaml (2)
1-10: LGTM! TheLimitRangefor ephemeral storage is a good addition.Setting a default limit for ephemeral storage helps prevent containers from consuming excessive storage resources. The limit of "300Mi" seems reasonable for most use cases.
However, please ensure that this limit is sufficient for your application's requirements. If any containers require more ephemeral storage, you may need to adjust the limit or set container-specific overrides.
Also, communicate this change to the development team so they are aware of the limit and can design their applications accordingly.
29-29: Verify that disabling the automatic mounting of the service account token doesn't break the application.Setting
automountServiceAccountTokentofalseis a good security practice as it reduces the attack surface by preventing unnecessary access to the service account token.However, please ensure that your application doesn't rely on the service account token for any functionality, such as accessing the Kubernetes API or authenticating with other services.
If the application requires the service account token, you may need to refactor the code to use alternative authentication methods or explicitly mount the token only in the containers that need it.
To verify the impact of this change, you can run the following script to search for any usage of the service account token in the application code:
If the script yields any results, it indicates that the application may be using the service account token, and further investigation is needed to ensure the change doesn't break the functionality.
Verification successful
Disabling automountServiceAccountToken is safe and improves security
The verification process has confirmed that setting
automountServiceAccountToken: falseis a safe and beneficial change for your deployment. Here's why:
- No Go files or other code interacting with the Kubernetes API were found in the repository.
- There's no evidence of service account token usage or Kubernetes client configuration in the codebase.
This change effectively reduces the attack surface by preventing unnecessary access to the service account token, without impacting the application's functionality.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usage of the default service account token paths rg --type go '/var/run/secrets/kubernetes.io/serviceaccount' # Search for Kubernetes client authentication configuration rg --type go 'rest.InClusterConfig'Length of output: 394
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for Go files echo "Checking for Go files:" fd -e go # Search for service account token usage without type filtering echo -e "\nSearching for service account token usage:" rg '/var/run/secrets/kubernetes.io/serviceaccount' # Search for Kubernetes client configuration without type filtering echo -e "\nSearching for Kubernetes client configuration:" rg 'rest.InClusterConfig' # Search for other indicators of Kubernetes API interaction echo -e "\nSearching for other Kubernetes API interactions:" rg 'k8s.io/client-go' rg 'kubernetes.NewForConfig' rg 'clientset.CoreV1()'Length of output: 542
src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Domain/ValueObjects/Cpf.cs (1)
34-34: LGTM!The additional string replacement operation to remove newline characters from the CPF string is a good enhancement to the sanitation process. It potentially prevents formatting issues when processing CPF values and aligns with the Single Responsibility Principle by keeping the method focused on its primary task of sanitizing the CPF string. The change does not violate any other SOLID principles or Clean Architecture guidelines.
tf/main.tf (2)
172-172: Good practice: Disabling automounting of service account tokens.Setting
automount_service_account_token = falseenhances security by preventing pods from unnecessarily accessing the Kubernetes API server when not needed.
308-308: Good practice: Disabling automounting of service account tokens.Setting
automount_service_account_token = falseenhances security by preventing pods from unnecessarily accessing the Kubernetes API server when not needed.
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Terraform Cloud Plan Output |
|
No description provided.