tests: rely on __SNR_xxx instead of __NR_xxx for syscalls

We recently changed how libseccomp handles syscall numbers that are not defined natively, but we missed test #15. Acked-by: Tom Hromatka <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <[email protected]>
seccomp · Nov 20, 2019 · 1ecdddb · 1ecdddb
1 parent c7d80ed
commit 1ecdddb
Showing 1 changed file with 3 additions and 3 deletions.
diff --git a/tests/15-basic-resolver.c b/tests/15-basic-resolver.c
@@ -55,15 +55,15 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
 	unsigned int arch;
 	char *name = NULL;
 
-	if (seccomp_syscall_resolve_name("open") != __NR_open)
+	if (seccomp_syscall_resolve_name("open") != __SNR_open)
 		goto fail;
-	if (seccomp_syscall_resolve_name("read") != __NR_read)
+	if (seccomp_syscall_resolve_name("read") != __SNR_read)
 		goto fail;
 	if (seccomp_syscall_resolve_name("INVALID") != __NR_SCMP_ERROR)
 		goto fail;
 
 	rc = seccomp_syscall_resolve_name_rewrite(SCMP_ARCH_NATIVE, "openat");
-	if (rc != __NR_openat)
+	if (rc != __SNR_openat)
 		goto fail;
 
 	while ((arch = arch_list[iter++]) != -1) {