feat: upgrade protocol-kit to v5

[schmanu]

What it solves

Upgrades to protocol-kit v5.

Resolves #

How this PR fixes it

How to test it

Screenshots

Checklist

• I've tested the branch on mobile 📱
• I've documented how it affects the analytics (if at all) 📊
• I've written a unit/e2e test for it (if applicable) 🧑‍💻

[github-actions]

Branch preview

❌ Deploy failed!

[github-actions]

Coverage report

Caution

Test run failed

St.❔	Category	Percentage	Covered / Total
🟡	Statements	77.91% (+0% 🔼)	12373/15881
🔴	Branches	58.24% (+0.03% 🔼)	3239/5561
🟡	Functions	65.16% (+0.06% 🔼)	1947/2988
🟡	Lines	79.42% (+0% 🔼)	11166/14060

Show files with reduced coverage 🔻

St.❔	File	Statements	Branches	Functions	Lines
🟡	... / useIsValidExecution.ts	65.85% (-5.26% 🔻)	60% (+1.67% 🔼)	60%	63.16% (-8.27% 🔻)
🟢	... / ContractErrorCodes.ts	66.67% (-33.33% 🔻)	100%	100%	100%

Test suite run failed

Failed tests: 1/1557. Failed suites: 1/205.

  ● useIsValidExecution › should append the error code description to the error thrown

    expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality

    Expected: "GS026: Invalid owner provided"
    Received: undefined

      91 |
      92 |     expect(isValidExecution).toBe(undefined)
    > 93 |     expect((executionValidationError as EthersError)?.reason).toBe('GS026: Invalid owner provided')
         |                                                               ^
      94 |     expect(isValidExecutionLoading).toBe(false)
      95 |   })
      96 | })

      at Object.toBe (src/features/recovery/hooks/__tests__/useIsValidExecution.test.ts:93:63)

Report generated by 🧪jest coverage report action from ae47dec

[schmanu]

Closing this for now in favor of #4334