Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix: revert using wallet RPC for readonly RPC #2477

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 31, 2023
Merged

Conversation

katspaugh
Copy link
Member

@katspaugh katspaugh commented Aug 31, 2023

What it solves

Fixes #2462 (comment)

Reverts a part of #2418.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 31, 2023

Branch preview

✅ Deploy successful!

https://revert_readonly--walletweb.review-wallet-web.5afe.dev

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 31, 2023

ESLint Summary View Full Report

Annotations are provided inline on the Files Changed tab. You can also see all annotations that were generated on the annotations page.

Type Occurrences Fixable
Errors 0 0
Warnings 0 0
Ignored 0 N/A
  • Result: ✅ success
  • Annotations: 0 total

Report generated by eslint-plus-action

Comment on lines +149 to +153
{submitError && (
<Box mt={1}>
<ErrorMessage error={submitError}>Error submitting the transaction. Please try again.</ErrorMessage>
</Box>
)}
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This error must be shown separate of validation errors because the user can still submit a tx and this error has been only logged in the console.

@katspaugh katspaugh merged commit a141aa1 into dev Aug 31, 2023
9 checks passed
@katspaugh katspaugh deleted the revert-readonly branch August 31, 2023 08:24
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 31, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants