-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 166
rosnode kill support (shut down the node) #291
base: kinetic
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Thanks for the contribution @wmlynar! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@wmlynar thanks again for the contribution, and sorry for the delay!
The code works well; I've left some comments regarding thread-safety and using base interfaces. If you could please address them, then I'll merge them into kinetic
.
@@ -52,12 +53,15 @@ | |||
private final TopicParticipantManager topicParticipantManager; | |||
private final ParameterManager parameterManager; | |||
private final TcpRosServer tcpRosServer; | |||
private final DefaultNode defaultNode; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd suggest changing to Node
instead of tying this to a particular implementation.
As we only need the shutdown
method, we can use the base interface instead.
@@ -81,13 +86,22 @@ public void start() { | |||
super.start(org.ros.internal.node.xmlrpc.SlaveXmlRpcEndpointImpl.class, | |||
new SlaveXmlRpcEndpointImpl(this)); | |||
tcpRosServer.start(); | |||
shutdownStarted = false; | |||
} | |||
|
|||
// TODO(damonkohler): This should also shut down the Node. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This comment can be removed.
if (shutdownStarted) { | ||
return; | ||
} | ||
shutdownStarted = true; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
About thread safety:
if shutdown
is called a second time after the if statement is processed but before shutdownStarted
is set to true
, it will be called twice.
To be completely sure, I'd suggest placing all the code in both shutdown
and start
in a synchronized
block using a dummy object as the lock. E.g.:
// In the constructor:
shutdownLock = new Object();
// Then:
@Override
public void shutdown() {
synchronized(shutdownLock) {
// current code goes here
}
}
And the same for start
.
This pull request is intended to resolve issue #289