-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 312
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Set argv[0] to .roc file passed to 'roc run' #7172
Merged
smores56
merged 1 commit into
roc-lang:main
from
jwoudenberg:expose-original-script-to-host
Oct 21, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ | ||
app [main] { | ||
pf: platform "https://github.com/roc-lang/basic-cli/releases/download/0.15.0/SlwdbJ-3GR7uBWQo6zlmYWNYOxnvo8r6YABXD-45UOw.tar.br", | ||
} | ||
|
||
import pf.Stdout | ||
import pf.Arg | ||
|
||
main = | ||
args = Arg.list! {} | ||
when List.first args is | ||
Ok argv0 -> Stdout.line argv0 | ||
Err ListWasEmpty -> Stdout.line "Failed: argv was empty" |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
From the added tests, it looks like a script in
/home/myuser/Documents/myscript.roc
would have the relative path included along with the name, but I think we should prefer just the file_name (a.k.a.myscript.roc
) since that's what will be wanted to display 99% of the time.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the relative name is important if we want to use argv[0] to look up the script location in the application.
For instance, if I'm in /home/jasper and run:
roc ./projects/foobar/main.roc
, if argv[0] only tells me I'm runningmain.roc
, then in the implementation ofmain.roc
I can't know where the script is located, for instance to read somedata.json
file that's supposed to be next to the script file.Bash works the same way btw! Try put this script somewhere:
And run it from a couple different places to observe the result.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Okay, if we're doing what bash is doing, I'm happy.