Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bugfix: use os.makedirs instead of os.mkdir #109

Merged

Conversation

shareefj
Copy link
Contributor

This commit updates riscof/framework/test to use os.makedirs(..., exists_ok=True) which prevents exceptions being raised when trying to rerun certain CLI commands that don't expect directories to already exist.

This commit updates riscof/framework/test to use os.makedirs(...,
exists_ok=True) which prevents exceptions being raised when trying to
rerun certain CLI commands that don't expect directories to already
exist.
@shareefj
Copy link
Contributor Author

This PR fixes one of the issues mentioned in #108

@jamesbeyond jamesbeyond changed the base branch from master to dev February 24, 2024 16:58
Copy link
Collaborator

@jamesbeyond jamesbeyond left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@jamesbeyond
Copy link
Collaborator

This minor improves looks good to me, happy to merge it into dev branch
What do you think? @neelgala @allenjbaum

@shareefj
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @jamesbeyond @neelgala @allenjbaum,

What's the official status of this repo as it seems to be pretty unmaintained? The few conversations I've had with others, admittedly very few and far distant from the project, had the opinion it had been left to rot. If that isn't the case then I'd be happy to submit a few more PRs for things as I get round to them. That one linked issue had a few suggestions of possible improvements.

The Incore documentation is also out of date and is due a clean-up so that it doesn't send people down the wrong path. If no one is supporting it any more, then perhaps just a big note on the front page to say it's out of date and not maintained would help people avoid spending time following incorrect instructions. I can't remember off the top of my head all the issues I found but it seemed that there were at least a couple of points that were just plain incorrect now.

It would be good to understand if and what anyone is maintaining. Cheers.

@jamesbeyond
Copy link
Collaborator

hi @shareefj

Thanks for providing feedbacks, I apology for not able to get back on those PRs with a timely manner. one major reason is because most of people working as part-time on those repos, and we are short for maintainers, so the progress are bit slow But now we are putting the repo governance guidelines together, and trying to assign more maintainers helping with us with this. So looking forward to speed up the PR review progress. If you are interested, please join ACT SIG and discuss with us via fortnightly zoom meetings. https://lists.riscv.org/g/sig-arch-test

one thing I can confirm is , this is one of the main repo we are maintaining, and maybe the docs are bit out of date, we are trying to get that up-to-date as well.

@shareefj
Copy link
Contributor Author

OK, thanks. That's great news.

@jamesbeyond jamesbeyond merged commit 3260df6 into riscv-software-src:dev May 19, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants