Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixing kernel verification #4159

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Fixing kernel verification #4159

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

julpark-rh
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Adding more suite for tier-0(fsstress,xfs)

Adding another file for fsstress

Please include Automation development guidelines. Source of Test case - New Feature/Regression Test/Close loop of customer BZs

click to expand checklist
  • Create a test case in Polarion reviewed and approved.
  • Create a design/automation approach doc. Optional for tests with similar tests already automated.
  • Review the automation design
  • Implement the test script and perform test runs
  • Submit PR for code review and approve
  • Update Polarion Test with Automation script details and update automation fields
  • If automation is part of Close loop, update BZ flag qe-test_coverage “+” and link Polarion test

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 10, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: julpark-rh

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@neha-gangadhar
Copy link
Contributor

@julpark-rh Is adding fsstress file needed? we have a test already using it can we not call the test as is? Are there modifications done to this file to explicitly keep this file?

@@ -133,10 +133,16 @@ tests:
abort-on-fail: false
- test:
name: Run fsstress on kernel and fuse mounts
module: cephfs_bugs.test_fsstress_on_kernel_and_fuse.py
module: cephfs_bugs.fsstress_kernel_verification.py
Copy link
Contributor

@hkadam134 hkadam134 Oct 16, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

any reason for having a separate test for kernel verification just for pacific ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants