Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Shiny for Python to Dashboarding #162

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

chendaniely
Copy link
Contributor

@chendaniely chendaniely commented Jul 21, 2023

Adding shiny for python as another dashboarding option for Python.

Let me know if I added this correctly. I edited the dashboarding/index.md directly. It didn't seem to follow the same process as adding a tool.

@chendaniely
Copy link
Contributor Author

Just noticed there's a dashboarding section under all tools. I'll to update the PR:

@chendaniely
Copy link
Contributor Author

Nvm. it's already listed in all tools 🤦

@jbednar
Copy link
Member

jbednar commented Jul 21, 2023

Thanks for the contribution!

However, as you can see there were only four main libraries when I wrote this page, and there are now 28 different dashboarding libraries for Python! I don't think it's feasible to say something meaningful and objectively true about all of them, and I cannot see any objective measure (downloads, contributors, star count, etc.) that would justify calling out Shiny in particular compared to the other dozens. So I don't think adding Shiny to the Dashboarding page would be appropriate.

Instead, I think the Dashboarding page should more prominently link to the Dashboarding section of the All Tools page, mention that there are dozens of competing libraries listed there, and then call out some feasible subset as examples, chosen by an objective measure. By popularity (downloads), what seems feasible to me is a cutoff at 100K/month, which gives five to discuss here, adding gradio (and with Bokeh treated separately). If you're interested in making those edits, feel free to repurpose this PR, or else we can close it and I'll open another PR for that purpose.

@jbednar jbednar closed this Oct 21, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants