Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add business cases section + databricks blog #562

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 1, 2024
Merged

Conversation

juanitorduz
Copy link
Collaborator

@juanitorduz juanitorduz commented Feb 29, 2024

Add a Business Cases section and the new DataBricks blog post reference.


📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pymc-marketing--562.org.readthedocs.build/en/562/

@juanitorduz juanitorduz self-assigned this Feb 29, 2024
@juanitorduz juanitorduz added docs Improvements or additions to documentation no releasenotes labels Feb 29, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 29, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 91.36%. Comparing base (612b4d4) to head (c14472e).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #562   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.36%   91.36%           
=======================================
  Files          21       21           
  Lines        2073     2073           
=======================================
  Hits         1894     1894           
  Misses        179      179           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@juanitorduz juanitorduz requested a review from twiecki March 1, 2024 07:47
@juanitorduz juanitorduz merged commit 608a446 into main Mar 1, 2024
9 checks passed
@juanitorduz juanitorduz deleted the databricks_blog_ref branch March 1, 2024 08:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs Improvements or additions to documentation no releasenotes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants