SolaraViz Updates

[Corvince]

Some more work on the SolaraViz Frontend. Highlights

1. Much better docstrings
2. Removed make_text function. It was used like make_text(renderer), but now you can use renderer directly as a component
3. Merged Play/Pause button and disabled step button while model is running
4. Reorganised the Sidebar to look like this
   

[github-actions]

Performance benchmarks:

Model	Size	Init time [95% CI]	Run time [95% CI]
BoltzmannWealth	small	🔵 -0.8% [-1.6%, +0.0%]	🔵 -0.4% [-0.6%, -0.2%]
BoltzmannWealth	large	🔵 +0.1% [-0.8%, +1.2%]	🔵 +1.8% [-0.7%, +5.7%]
Schelling	small	🔵 +0.1% [-0.2%, +0.4%]	🔵 -0.7% [-0.9%, -0.5%]
Schelling	large	🔵 +0.8% [+0.2%, +1.4%]	🔵 -1.2% [-2.6%, +0.4%]
WolfSheep	small	🔵 +0.1% [-0.6%, +0.7%]	🔵 -0.1% [-0.4%, +0.1%]
WolfSheep	large	🔵 +1.6% [+0.9%, +2.3%]	🔵 +0.9% [-2.4%, +4.3%]
BoidFlockers	small	🔵 -1.3% [-1.6%, -0.8%]	🔵 -1.0% [-1.5%, -0.5%]
BoidFlockers	large	🔵 -1.2% [-1.5%, -1.0%]	🔵 -0.5% [-0.9%, -0.0%]

[EwoutH]

Looks great!

Not directly for this PR, but are you still supporting a name change (we were considering ModelExplorer right)?

[rht]

Removed make_text function. It was used like make_text(renderer), but now you can use renderer directly as a component

Which objects are allowed/not allowed? make_text was specific to string objects. Would float work?

[rht]

I didn't voice this concern in the past: but before this PR, the reset button was dangerously close to the play button, that people could accidentally fat-fingered it. But now it seems safer.

[rht]

One of the tests in test_solara_viz.py failed.

[Corvince]

Which objects are allowed/not allowed? make_text was specific to string objects. Would float work?

Good question, I don't know. I would guess only strings work, but I will test this out

[rht]

In this case, it's fine since I haven't provided any change requests, so the agreement is implicit, but in the future, I'd appreciate if the visualization PR gets merged when I explicitly approve, since @EwoutH hadn't dev-ed in the viz area yet.

[Corvince]

Sounds fine to me! But yes, since you already replied without any change requests I thought you are fine with the changes. And appreciated the heads-up to the failing test