blog: add the v0.13.0 release post

[rich-iannone]

This adds the blog post for the v0.13.0 release of the package.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 87.86%. Comparing base (06b1408) to head (e9a6a98).
Report is 32 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #488   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   87.86%   87.86%           
=======================================
  Files          42       42           
  Lines        4852     4852           
=======================================
  Hits         4263     4263           
  Misses        589      589           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[machow]

It's looking really great! One more quick nit, if it's okay. I noticed leading into a few examples, that what people should see in the output is not explained.

For example...

• "you can do this:" (what is this?)
• "let's style" (what style should I look for?)
• "add an assortment of styles to it." (what styles? what should I look for?)
• "let's use tab_options() here" (to do what? what should I look for?)

Could we tell people specifically what will change (so they know what to look for)? E.g.

• "You can manually indent STABLE using a CSS string:"
• "Let's set a grey background fill on the column header, stubhead, and footnotes:" (no need to say you are using tab_style() people will see it, and they have seen tab_style() used several times at this point.)
• Set an aliceblue background fill on the title, with some font and border adjustments.
• Set a default honeydew background fill on body values.

(Definitely tweak as needed! I think the key is that people should be able to quickly identify what in the table will change; it's okay to just say the easiest to spot piece.)

Screenshots

[machow]

Yo, this looks great! I left a small note on a paragraph that's duplicated above and below an example now. It looks like the top piece just needs to be cut out

[machow]

I think the last piece might just be removing this, since it's down below the example now!