-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
docs(python): Properly expose InProcessQuery
in docs, mark as unstable
#17097
Conversation
InProcessQuery
in docs, mark as unstableInProcessQuery
in docs, mark as unstable
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #17097 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 80.86% 80.87% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 1456 1456
Lines 191141 191141
Branches 2728 2728
==========================================
+ Hits 154562 154584 +22
+ Misses 36073 36051 -22
Partials 506 506 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, I made the docs, but never exposed them? :')
Yep 😅 |
Also remove the top-level re-export. It doesn't need to be re-exported because users do not instantiate it themselves. Similar to
GroupBy
.