You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Tracking issue for what we definitely need to cut a 1.0 release for substrate, which we should aim for before this makes its way into any mainnet chains. Note that we may do an intermediate release for the substrate PR paritytech/substrate#8615, leaving the door open for any breaking changes after that PR is merged, but before it is deployed anywhere.
Tracking issue for what we definitely need to cut a
1.0
release for substrate, which we should aim for before this makes its way into any mainnet chains. Note that we may do an intermediate release for the substrate PR paritytech/substrate#8615, leaving the door open for any breaking changes after that PR is merged, but before it is deployed anywhere.#[codec(index = …)]
in regular enums #80Handle Box types Don't eraseEdit: can go in aBox
types #821.x
releaseTypeInfo
bounds on type params #95TypeInfo
bound on theT
inPhantomData
to remove the requirement for some unnecessary(?)TypeInfo
bounds in Enrich metadata with type information substrate#8615Naming of things, are we happy with naming of types/concepts etc. before we lock down forEdit: naming stays the same for 1.01.0
?Composite
andVariant
type defs RenameComposite
andVariant
type defs #93The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: