Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

luci-mod-status: split dhcp status in dhcp and dhcpv6 includes #6713

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Ansuel
Copy link
Member

@Ansuel Ansuel commented Nov 21, 2023

Split dhcp status in separate dhcp and dhcpv6 includes to tidy code up and better organize them instead of defining multiple table and define an empty title for the include file.

Split dhcp status in separate dhcp and dhcpv6 includes to tidy code up and
better organize them instead of defining multiple table and define an
empty title for the include file.

Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <[email protected]>
@zdz2019
Copy link

zdz2019 commented Dec 2, 2023

error:

ReferenceError
machints is not defined

@zdz2019
Copy link

zdz2019 commented Dec 2, 2023

test

@systemcrash
Copy link
Contributor

@Ansuel could you address this machints problem please?

@systemcrash systemcrash added feature pull request adding a new feature Needs testing Need testing Work needed Needs work by the pullrequest creator labels Dec 4, 2023
@jow-
Copy link
Contributor

jow- commented Dec 7, 2023

This will request the DHCP lease information twice and duplicate the processing effort on the server side. If this is touched anyway, I'd propose a radically different way... merge DHCP and DHCPv6 tables (along with potential other information sources such as associated stations, arp and ndp neighbors as well as umdns) into a unified "connected clients/hosts/devices" display.

@Ansuel
Copy link
Member Author

Ansuel commented Dec 9, 2023

@jow- would be ok to unify ipv6 and ipv4 for now?

To do this we would have to change the ipv4 and ipv6 address column to "Address" and the mac address and DUID to an unified column.

Is it correct?

@systemcrash systemcrash marked this pull request as draft December 30, 2023 02:55
@Neustradamus
Copy link

@Ansuel: Have you progressed on this PR?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature pull request adding a new feature Needs testing Need testing Work needed Needs work by the pullrequest creator
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants