Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added nighlty benchmark for concurrent search and 2.7 version #3860

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 9, 2023

Conversation

rishabh6788
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

This PR:

  1. Adds nightly benchmark for concurrent-search feature for 2.10 and 3.0 snapshot versions. The benchmark runs against different max_slice_count config: 0,2,4,6.
  2. Also adds nightly benchmark to generate performance metric for 2.7 version for comparison purpose.

Issues Resolved

List any issues this PR will resolve, e.g. Closes [...].

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 9, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #3860 (3f0a30d) into main (5be0a24) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #3860   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.86%   91.86%           
=======================================
  Files         186      186           
  Lines        5633     5633           
=======================================
  Hits         5175     5175           
  Misses        458      458           

@peterzhuamazon
Copy link
Member

Thanks @rishabh6788 please confirm this jenkinsfile runs without errors on staging.
Thanks.

@rishabh6788 rishabh6788 merged commit 81a404d into opensearch-project:main Aug 9, 2023
13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants