Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Label correction on test #156

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 17, 2024

Conversation

rijuma
Copy link
Member

@rijuma rijuma commented Oct 17, 2024

Addressing a comment that I forgot on a previous PR. I've used the expression "legacy LTI exams" when it was meant to be "legacy proctoring exams".

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 17, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 94.29%. Comparing base (0b764d2) to head (e48797d).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #156   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   94.29%   94.29%           
=======================================
  Files          68       68           
  Lines        1086     1086           
  Branches      300      300           
=======================================
  Hits         1024     1024           
  Misses         57       57           
  Partials        5        5           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@rijuma rijuma marked this pull request as ready for review October 17, 2024 12:49
Copy link
Contributor

@schenedx schenedx left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@rijuma rijuma merged commit d32f682 into main Oct 17, 2024
9 checks passed
@rijuma rijuma deleted the rijuma-remove-retry-on-lti-proctorio-tests-nit branch October 17, 2024 13:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants