Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix: Use code-server reference in all the files #390

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 24, 2024

Conversation

harshad16
Copy link
Member

@harshad16 harshad16 commented Jan 24, 2024

Fix: Use code-server reference in all the files

Description

Fix: Use code-server reference in all the files

Related-to: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHOAIENG-2188

How Has This Been Tested?

NA

Merge criteria:

  • The commits are squashed in a cohesive manner and have meaningful messages.
  • Testing instructions have been added in the PR body (for PRs involving changes that are not immediately obvious).
  • The developer has manually tested the changes and verified that the changes work

@jstourac
Copy link
Member

I can see that you updated also functional code. Then we have to check that we really didn't break anything with this one 😄

Copy link
Member

@jiridanek jiridanek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Server docs seem to either say "Code Server", capitalized, with space, or "code-server", lowercase and with hyphen (same as the cli command is named). I think we should not create our own hybrid.

I started doing the suggestions in GHA but this is best to address with find-and-replace locally, so I'll go delete them again.

@harshad16 harshad16 force-pushed the fix-naming-codeserver branch 3 times, most recently from 82d2ca3 to c1afdeb Compare January 24, 2024 16:20
@harshad16
Copy link
Member Author

I can see that you updated also functional code. Then we have to check that we really didn't break anything with this one 😄

all good, tested this , it works without issue.
podman run -it -p 8888:8787 quay.io/opendatahub/workbench-images:codeserver-ubi9-python-3.9-pr-390

@rkpattnaik780
Copy link
Contributor

Do we need to rename the extension files as well? Example

Copy link
Contributor

@rkpattnaik780 rkpattnaik780 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

Thanks for the changes!
Added one question.

Copy link
Member

@jiridanek jiridanek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm, with the small complaint about the wording of image description text

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 24, 2024

@jiridanek: changing LGTM is restricted to collaborators

In response to this:

/lgtm, with the small complaint about the wording of image description test

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@atheo89
Copy link
Member

atheo89 commented Jan 24, 2024

Do we need to rename the extension files as well? Example

I suggest maintaining the current file name as it was downloaded from the marketplace. We may lost traceability otherwise

@jiridanek
Copy link
Member

Do we need to rename the extension files as well? Example

The names are named exactly as the files are named on https://open-vsx.org, I checked https://open-vsx.org/extension/ms-toolsai/vscode-jupyter-cell-tags. So I think we should not rename them.

Copy link
Member

@atheo89 atheo89 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for changing all these references!
Apart of few suggestions, /lgtm

Signed-off-by: Harshad Reddy Nalla <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Jan Stourac <[email protected]>
@atheo89
Copy link
Member

atheo89 commented Jan 24, 2024

/LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 24, 2024

@harshad16: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/notebook-cuda-rstudio-c9s-python-3-9-pr-image-mirror 2305f1e link true /test notebook-cuda-rstudio-c9s-python-3-9-pr-image-mirror

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@harshad16
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks for all the reviews.
Merging this in.
/approve

@harshad16 harshad16 merged commit 879392e into opendatahub-io:main Jan 24, 2024
4 of 7 checks passed
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 24, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: harshad16, jiridanek, rkpattnaik780

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

harshad16 added a commit to harshad16/odh-notebooks that referenced this pull request Oct 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants