Implement typings in conda-smithy #1

ninetteadhikari · 2024-05-16T13:14:31Z

Introduction

This work is done according to "Milestone 2: Implement typings in conda-smithy" as stated in the Scope of Work with Sovereign Tech Fund (STF) (https://www.sovereigntechfund.de/).

This PR addresses the typing request from this issue

Setup

Setup details are here: https://github.com/neighbourhoodie/conda-smithy/wiki

Steps followed to add type

As suggested in the ticket in the conda-smithy repo, MonkeyType is used to generate type hints for the python code.

Generate type hints

Install MonkeyType

pip install MonkeyType

Run tests using MonkeyType. This will dump call traces into a SQLite database in the file monkeytype.sqlite3 in the current working directory.

monkeytype run -m pytest

Make a separate folder called stubs to save the type hint files

mkdir stubs

Generate stub files for each of the modules found in the SQLite database

monkeytype list-modules | xargs -n1 -I{} sh -c 'monkeytype stub {} > stubs/{}.pyi'

The above command will create stub files in the stubs folder. Here's an example of what the content of a stub file will look like. It gives suggestions for types.

def rotate_anaconda_token(
    user: str,
    project: str,
    feedstock_config_path: Optional[str],
    drone: bool = ...,
    circle: bool = ...,
    travis: bool = ...,
    azure: bool = ...,
    appveyor: bool = ...,
    github_actions: bool = ...,
    token_name: str = ...,
    drone_endpoints: List[str] = ...
): ...

The suggestions generated in the stub file were used make changes to the actual python code.

Checklist

Ran monkeytypes to get type suggestions
Add type to conda_smithy modules
Add type to tests
Add documentation on using Monkeytype
Add mypy for type checks

coveralls · 2024-06-07T15:54:38Z

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9419614194

Warning: This coverage report may be inaccurate.

This pull request's base commit is no longer the HEAD commit of its target branch. This means it includes changes from outside the original pull request, including, potentially, unrelated coverage changes.

For more information on this, see Tracking coverage changes with pull request builds.
To avoid this issue with future PRs, see these Recommended CI Configurations.
For a quick fix, rebase this PR at GitHub. Your next report should be accurate.

Details

130 of 131 (99.24%) changed or added relevant lines in 11 files are covered.
16 unchanged lines in 1 file lost coverage.
Overall coverage increased (+0.1%) to 67.943%

Changes Missing Coverage	Covered Lines	Changed/Added Lines	%
conda_smithy/variant_algebra.py	6	7	85.71%

Files with Coverage Reduction	New Missed Lines	%
conda_smithy/lint_recipe.py	16	94.24%

Totals
Change from base Build 9299597764:	0.1%
Covered Lines:	2807
Relevant Lines:	4049

💛 - Coveralls

hulkoba · 2024-06-10T07:44:38Z

.github/workflows/tests.yml

@@ -66,6 +66,10 @@ jobs:
        env:
          GH_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}

+      - name: run type check
+        run: |
+          mypy conda_smithy tests


We only check the types at tests?

i added type check for the folders 'conda_smithy' and 'tests'. wasn't sure if other files/folders require type check to run as well..

hulkoba · 2024-06-10T07:46:07Z

conda_smithy/anaconda_token_rotation.py

+    appveyor: bool = True,
+    github_actions: bool = True,
+    token_name: str = "BINSTAR_TOKEN",
+    drone_endpoints = (),


Question: this is a type that doesn't exist? can't we at least use list or function? (what is this?)

it seems like list | tuple worked. Only adding list was throwing error that () is not a list

My best guess is that () is the empty tuple, which is not a very useful value to pass to any function.

hulkoba · 2024-06-10T07:47:17Z

conda_smithy/cli.py

-    subcommand = None
-    aliases = []
+    subcommand: Optional[str] = None
+    aliases: list = []


Do we know the type of the list here so it can be List?

added List[str]

hulkoba · 2024-06-10T08:00:41Z

conda_smithy/configure_feedstock.py

@@ -208,7 +260,7 @@ def break_up_top_level_values(top_level_keys, squished_variants):
        zip_key_groups = squished_variants["zip_keys"]
        if zip_key_groups and not isinstance(zip_key_groups[0], list):
            zip_key_groups = [zip_key_groups]
-    zipped_configs = []
+    zipped_configs: list = []
    top_level_dimensions = []


what about the top_level_dimensions?

oops i missed that! added.

hulkoba · 2024-06-10T08:01:34Z

conda_smithy/configure_feedstock.py

                    for idx, variant_key in enumerate(squished_variants[key]):
-                        top_level_config = []
+                        top_level_config: Any = []


I am sure you checked this, but can we avoid Any?

this is a tricky one:( top_level_config is being declared as a list initially and then being converted to tuple on line 287. i tried using list | tuple but then it throws another error for append. If I leave out the type altogether this append error still persists:(
Item "tuple[Any, ...]" of "list[Any] | tuple[Any, ...]" has no attribute "append"
I added Any to avoid the errors since i couldn't find any other appropriate type 🙈

If something is being converted to a different type, you could try using a new variable name when the conversion happens and giving each variable a distinct type.

hulkoba · 2024-06-10T08:03:04Z

conda_smithy/configure_feedstock.py

    top_level_loop_vars = set()

    all_used_vars = set()
-    all_variants = set()
+    all_variants: Any = set()



top_level_loop_vars and all_used_vars are already set?

for some reason mypy was complaining that all_variants needs a type. So I added Any but now I updated it and added type as set. Also updated the function _merge_deployment_target on line 506 to set for the types to align.

hulkoba · 2024-06-10T08:05:26Z

conda_smithy/configure_feedstock.py

-    check=False,
-    temporary_directory=None,
+    forge_file_directory: str,
+    forge_yml: None = None,


Is this always none?

oops no, i updated it to be Optional[str] to have both str and None. (I use Optional instead of | because | is causing error for python 3.8.19, which is what github actions is running..)

hulkoba · 2024-06-10T08:05:59Z

conda_smithy/feedstock_io.py

-
-
-def get_repo(path, search_parent_directories=True):
+from io import TextIOWrapper


Please check this import

now I saw it. Mh... I am unsure

this was a suggestion when I ran monkeytype, but if it doesn't make sense we can take it out..

hulkoba · 2024-06-10T08:08:19Z

conda_smithy/schema.py

@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ class BotConfigVersionUpdatesSourcesChoice(StrEnum):
 class AzureRunnerSettings(BaseModel):
    """This is the settings for runners."""

-    model_config: ConfigDict = ConfigDict(extra="allow")
+    model_config = ConfigDict(extra="allow")


why did you remove the type?

this error keeps showing up for ConfigDict. wasn't sure how to address this 🙈
Cannot override class variable (previously declared on base class "BaseModel") with instance variable

hulkoba · 2024-06-10T08:11:41Z

tests/test_feedstock_io.py

@@ -11,17 +11,23 @@

 import git
 from git.index.typ import BlobFilter
+from git.repo.base import Repo


do we need this import?

removed it.

hulkoba · 2024-06-10T08:13:11Z

tests/test_feedstock_tokens.py

@@ -5,6 +5,9 @@

 import pytest
 import scrypt
+from _pytest._py.path import LocalPath


Question: What is the difference between pytest and _pytest?

jcoglan · 2024-06-13T09:49:27Z

conda_smithy/configure_feedstock.py

+            OrderedDict,
+            List[Union[str, List[str]]],
+            List[List[str]],
+        ],


I am not familiar with mypy specifically, so this is a hunch based on other type systems: I would expect the type List[Union[str, List[str]]] to be identical to Union[List[str], List[List[str]]], so can this whole type be reduced to Union[List[Union[str, List[str]]], OrderedDict]?

Or, if the nested unions are too confusing, Union[List[str], List[List[str]], OrderedDict]?

jcoglan · 2024-06-13T09:55:45Z

conda_smithy/configure_feedstock.py

@@ -107,7 +136,7 @@ def package_key(config, used_loop_vars, subdir):
    return key.replace("*", "_").replace(" ", "_")


-def _ignore_match(ignore, rel):
+def _ignore_match(ignore: Union[Set[str], Tuple[()]], rel: str):


Did we find out what the type () refers to? I can't find it in the mypy docs, and Tuple[()] (i.e. a tuple with a single element of type ()) doesn't seem very useful.

Ah ok, Tuple[()] is the type for the empty tuple; if you use () as a type mypy will tell you to use Tuple[()] or None instead.

jcoglan · 2024-06-13T10:00:02Z

conda_smithy/configure_feedstock.py

    return sorted(range(len(seq)), key=seq.__getitem__)


-def sort_config(config, zip_key_groups):
+def sort_config(
+    config: OrderedDict, zip_key_groups: List[Union[List[str], Any]]


Is the type Union[T, Any] equivalent to Any? If not, what makes it different and how are you allowed to use the value that might be a T or anything else?

adding the discussion from slack here

https://neighbourhoodie.slack.com/archives/C069J3L39HN/p1718277724884569?thread_ts=1717776546.052819&cid=C069J3L39HN
if x: Union[A, B, C...], then for the call x.foo(), all types A, B, C etc need to have a foo() method
so that means Union[T, Any] and Any are not the same thing; it means a value could be anything but you need to wrap it in isinstance(val, T) before using it
and then you get the benefits of type-checking T, whereas if you'd just used Any you'd get no type checks at all

jcoglan · 2024-06-13T10:01:16Z

conda_smithy/configure_feedstock.py

+            OrderedDict,
+            List[Union[str, List[str]]],
+            List[List[str]],
+        ],


See earlier comment about reducing the complexity of this type.

jcoglan · 2024-06-13T10:04:53Z

conda_smithy/configure_feedstock.py

+                Tuple[str, str, str, str],
+                Tuple[str],
+                Tuple[str, str, str, str, str],
+                List[List[str]],


These tuples look odd -- this really looks like the function really expects an arbitrary-size collection of strings (List[str], Set[str] etc) but some callers are passing this as a tuple. Rather than specifying every size of tuple we accept I would treat this as a signal to go and fix the callers to stop them using tuples.

i changed it to this Union[set, dict, list, tuple] keeping it generic.. not sure if this helps to reduce complexity..

jcoglan · 2024-06-13T10:06:04Z

conda_smithy/configure_feedstock.py

+            List[Union[str, List[str]]],
+            List[List[str]],
+        ],
+    ],


c.f. earlier comment to simplify this type.

simplified it to generic Union[list, OrderedDict]

jcoglan · 2024-06-13T10:06:50Z

conda_smithy/configure_feedstock.py

+    str,
+    Union[
+        List[str], OrderedDict, List[Union[str, List[str]]], List[List[str]]
+    ],


Again this is equivalent to Union[List[str], List[List[str]], OrderedDict].

jcoglan · 2024-06-13T10:15:33Z

conda_smithy/configure_feedstock.py

+                Union[List[str], Dict[str, Dict[str, str]], List[List[str]]],
+            ],
+        ]
+    ] = None,


I think this whole type simplifies to Optional[Dict[str, Union[List[str], List[List[str]], Dict[str, Dict[str, str]]]]].

jcoglan · 2024-06-13T14:13:43Z

conda_smithy/validate_schema.py

+            ],
+        ],
+        Dict[str, Union[str, bool]],
+    ],


I believe this type is equivalent to:

Union[ CommentedMap, Dict[str, bool], Dict[str, str], Dict[str, List[str]], Dict[str, Dict[str, bool]], Dict[str, Dict[str, Dict[str, str]]] ]

Or, if you want to remove a bit of duplication without too much extra union nesting:

Union[ CommentedMap, Dict[str, Union[ bool, str, List[str], Dict[str, bool], Dict[str, Dict[str, str]] ]] ]

I think either of these is more readable than the existing type.

coveralls · 2024-06-19T19:45:29Z

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9587371809

Warning: This coverage report may be inaccurate.

This pull request's base commit is no longer the HEAD commit of its target branch. This means it includes changes from outside the original pull request, including, potentially, unrelated coverage changes.

For more information on this, see Tracking coverage changes with pull request builds.
To avoid this issue with future PRs, see these Recommended CI Configurations.
For a quick fix, rebase this PR at GitHub. Your next report should be accurate.

Details

144 of 146 (98.63%) changed or added relevant lines in 11 files are covered.
23 unchanged lines in 1 file lost coverage.
Overall coverage increased (+0.2%) to 67.996%

Changes Missing Coverage	Covered Lines	Changed/Added Lines	%
conda_smithy/configure_feedstock.py	59	60	98.33%
conda_smithy/variant_algebra.py	6	7	85.71%

Files with Coverage Reduction	New Missed Lines	%
conda_smithy/lint_recipe.py	23	94.31%

Totals
Change from base Build 9299597764:	0.2%
Covered Lines:	2809
Relevant Lines:	4051

💛 - Coveralls

espy · 2024-06-20T08:20:59Z

tests/test_cli.py

@@ -14,12 +14,12 @@

 _thisdir = os.path.abspath(os.path.dirname(__file__))

-InitArgs = collections.namedtuple(
+InitArgs = collections.namedtuple( # type: ignore
    "ArgsObject",


I think you can resolve this by passing "InitArgs" as the first argument instead of "ArgsObject", if I understood this correctly. Makes no difference to the tests, at least.

Same for the one below, pass in "RegenerateArgs" instead.

i was afraid this might break the test so i ignored it but it worked! updated it.

espy

Sorry, I meant to just make comments, not start a review 🙈

espy · 2024-06-20T08:43:24Z

conda_smithy/schema.py

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
 from conda.base.constants import KNOWN_SUBDIRS

 try:
-    from enum import StrEnum
+    from enum import StrEnum # type: ignore
 except ImportError:
    from backports.strenum import StrEnum


I think it's better to ignore the error on the second import, at least that’s what I gather from here.

hmm moving the ignore to the second import StrEnum brings back the error: Module "enum" has no attribute "StrEnum" :(

coveralls · 2024-06-20T11:55:38Z

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9596910568

Warning: This coverage report may be inaccurate.

This pull request's base commit is no longer the HEAD commit of its target branch. This means it includes changes from outside the original pull request, including, potentially, unrelated coverage changes.

For more information on this, see Tracking coverage changes with pull request builds.
To avoid this issue with future PRs, see these Recommended CI Configurations.
For a quick fix, rebase this PR at GitHub. Your next report should be accurate.

Details

144 of 146 (98.63%) changed or added relevant lines in 11 files are covered.
23 unchanged lines in 1 file lost coverage.
Overall coverage increased (+0.2%) to 67.996%

Changes Missing Coverage	Covered Lines	Changed/Added Lines	%
conda_smithy/configure_feedstock.py	59	60	98.33%
conda_smithy/variant_algebra.py	6	7	85.71%

Files with Coverage Reduction	New Missed Lines	%
conda_smithy/lint_recipe.py	23	94.31%

Totals
Change from base Build 9299597764:	0.2%
Covered Lines:	2809
Relevant Lines:	4051

💛 - Coveralls

coveralls · 2024-06-20T14:47:37Z

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9599544458

Details

146 of 148 (98.65%) changed or added relevant lines in 11 files are covered.
No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
Overall coverage increased (+0.09%) to 67.996%

Changes Missing Coverage	Covered Lines	Changed/Added Lines	%
conda_smithy/configure_feedstock.py	59	60	98.33%
conda_smithy/variant_algebra.py	6	7	85.71%

Totals
Change from base Build 9563050021:	0.09%
Covered Lines:	2809
Relevant Lines:	4051

💛 - Coveralls

coveralls · 2024-06-20T14:52:01Z

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9599610108

Details

146 of 148 (98.65%) changed or added relevant lines in 11 files are covered.
No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
Overall coverage increased (+0.09%) to 67.996%

Changes Missing Coverage	Covered Lines	Changed/Added Lines	%
conda_smithy/configure_feedstock.py	59	60	98.33%
conda_smithy/variant_algebra.py	6	7	85.71%

Totals
Change from base Build 9563050021:	0.09%
Covered Lines:	2809
Relevant Lines:	4051

💛 - Coveralls

coveralls · 2024-06-20T15:14:01Z

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9599947730

Details

143 of 145 (98.62%) changed or added relevant lines in 11 files are covered.
No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
Overall coverage increased (+0.09%) to 67.996%

Changes Missing Coverage	Covered Lines	Changed/Added Lines	%
conda_smithy/configure_feedstock.py	59	60	98.33%
conda_smithy/variant_algebra.py	6	7	85.71%

Totals
Change from base Build 9563050021:	0.09%
Covered Lines:	2809
Relevant Lines:	4051

💛 - Coveralls

coveralls · 2024-06-27T19:25:59Z

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9702412366

Warning: This coverage report may be inaccurate.

This pull request's base commit is no longer the HEAD commit of its target branch. This means it includes changes from outside the original pull request, including, potentially, unrelated coverage changes.

For more information on this, see Tracking coverage changes with pull request builds.
To avoid this issue with future PRs, see these Recommended CI Configurations.
For a quick fix, rebase this PR at GitHub. Your next report should be accurate.

Details

143 of 145 (98.62%) changed or added relevant lines in 11 files are covered.
2 unchanged lines in 1 file lost coverage.
Overall coverage increased (+0.06%) to 67.963%

Changes Missing Coverage	Covered Lines	Changed/Added Lines	%
conda_smithy/configure_feedstock.py	59	60	98.33%
conda_smithy/variant_algebra.py	6	7	85.71%

Files with Coverage Reduction	New Missed Lines	%
conda_smithy/configure_feedstock.py	2	82.98%

Totals
Change from base Build 9563050021:	0.06%
Covered Lines:	2808
Relevant Lines:	4051

💛 - Coveralls

coveralls · 2024-06-27T19:30:35Z

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9702463236

Details

143 of 145 (98.62%) changed or added relevant lines in 11 files are covered.
No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
Overall coverage increased (+0.09%) to 67.963%

Changes Missing Coverage	Covered Lines	Changed/Added Lines	%
conda_smithy/configure_feedstock.py	59	60	98.33%
conda_smithy/variant_algebra.py	6	7	85.71%

Totals
Change from base Build 9702449954:	0.09%
Covered Lines:	2808
Relevant Lines:	4051

💛 - Coveralls

coveralls · 2024-06-27T19:35:07Z

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9702496514

Details

143 of 145 (98.62%) changed or added relevant lines in 11 files are covered.
No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
Overall coverage increased (+0.09%) to 67.963%

Changes Missing Coverage	Covered Lines	Changed/Added Lines	%
conda_smithy/configure_feedstock.py	59	60	98.33%
conda_smithy/variant_algebra.py	6	7	85.71%

Totals
Change from base Build 9702449954:	0.09%
Covered Lines:	2808
Relevant Lines:	4051

💛 - Coveralls

coveralls · 2024-08-28T14:22:10Z

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 10599090712

Details

131 of 133 (98.5%) changed or added relevant lines in 14 files are covered.
No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
Overall coverage increased (+0.06%) to 70.283%

Changes Missing Coverage	Covered Lines	Changed/Added Lines	%
conda_smithy/configure_feedstock.py	59	60	98.33%
conda_smithy/variant_algebra.py	6	7	85.71%

Totals
Change from base Build 10598408429:	0.06%
Covered Lines:	3189
Relevant Lines:	4458

💛 - Coveralls

Add mypy to GitHub workflow and to the environment yml

Add mypy type ignore for some tests and conda smithy files, which couldn't be resolved.

hulkoba reviewed Jun 10, 2024

View reviewed changes

jcoglan reviewed Jun 13, 2024

View reviewed changes

espy reviewed Jun 20, 2024

View reviewed changes

ninetteadhikari force-pushed the m2-add-type branch from 27ea642 to e3ef37d Compare June 20, 2024 14:42

ninetteadhikari force-pushed the m2-add-type branch from 86fcf8b to ce9dc1f Compare June 20, 2024 14:47

ninetteadhikari changed the title ~~add type for conda_smithy~~ Implement typings in conda-smithy Jun 20, 2024

ninetteadhikari force-pushed the m2-add-type branch 2 times, most recently from 82d1fb1 to b2a66d4 Compare June 27, 2024 19:29

ninetteadhikari force-pushed the m2-add-type branch 2 times, most recently from 00b9c49 to a4e89f7 Compare August 23, 2024 10:45

ninetteadhikari and others added 14 commits August 28, 2024 16:48

feat: Add type for conda_smithy

4b38c8a

feat: Add type for tests

2e12bf8

ci: Add mypy to workflow and environment

9306cc5

Add mypy to GitHub workflow and to the environment yml

chore: install missing type dependencies

e4c183f

chore: ignore remaining missing imports in mypy

e967560

fix: Add type ignore

7348daf

Add mypy type ignore for some tests and conda smithy files, which couldn't be resolved.

chore: Reformat files with black and add news entry

899773b

chore: Reformat files with black

ced7757

chore: Update tests to rebase

958971a

chore: Format file with black

e4953e8

fix: Update types to address errors

7f7e5f0

fix: Add type fixes

1babdf1

chore: Formatting with ruff

9e26d3b

ci: Make type check optional

bafe408

ninetteadhikari force-pushed the m2-add-type branch from 47bcea6 to bafe408 Compare August 28, 2024 14:48



		def get_repo(path, search_parent_directories=True):
		from io import TextIOWrapper

Implement typings in conda-smithy #1

Are you sure you want to change the base?

Implement typings in conda-smithy #1

Conversation

ninetteadhikari commented May 16, 2024 • edited Loading

Introduction

Setup

Steps followed to add type

Generate type hints

Checklist

coveralls commented Jun 7, 2024 • edited Loading

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9419614194

Warning: This coverage report may be inaccurate.

Details

💛 - Coveralls

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

jcoglan Jun 13, 2024 • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

ninetteadhikari Jun 10, 2024 • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

ninetteadhikari Jun 18, 2024 • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

coveralls commented Jun 19, 2024 • edited Loading

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9587371809

Warning: This coverage report may be inaccurate.

Details

💛 - Coveralls

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

espy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

coveralls commented Jun 20, 2024 • edited Loading

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9596910568

Warning: This coverage report may be inaccurate.

Details

💛 - Coveralls

coveralls commented Jun 20, 2024 • edited Loading

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9599544458

Details

💛 - Coveralls

coveralls commented Jun 20, 2024 • edited Loading

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9599610108

Details

💛 - Coveralls

ninetteadhikari commented May 16, 2024 •

edited

Loading

coveralls commented Jun 7, 2024 •

edited

Loading

jcoglan Jun 13, 2024 •

edited

Loading

ninetteadhikari Jun 10, 2024 •

edited

Loading

ninetteadhikari Jun 18, 2024 •

edited

Loading

coveralls commented Jun 19, 2024 •

edited

Loading

coveralls commented Jun 20, 2024 •

edited

Loading

coveralls commented Jun 20, 2024 •

edited

Loading

coveralls commented Jun 20, 2024 •

edited

Loading

coveralls commented Jun 20, 2024 •

edited

Loading

coveralls commented Jun 27, 2024 •

edited

Loading

coveralls commented Jun 27, 2024 •

edited

Loading

coveralls commented Jun 27, 2024 •

edited

Loading

coveralls commented Aug 28, 2024 •

edited

Loading