RC/v1.6.0

[iulianpascalau]

Reasoning behind the pull request

• container branch

Proposed changes

• container branch

Testing procedure

Pre-requisites

Based on the Contributing Guidelines the PR author and the reviewers must check the following requirements are met:

• was the PR targeted to the correct branch?
• if this is a larger feature that probably needs more than one PR, is there a feat branch created?
• if this is a feat branch merging, do all satellite projects have a proper tag inside go.mod?

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: 75 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (e134e53) 77.65% compared to head (2af5088) 80.17%.

Files	Patch %	Lines
api/groups/addressGroup.go	81.81%	8 Missing and 6 partials ⚠️
consensus/blacklist/blacklist.go	75.51%	10 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
api/groups/nodeGroup.go	88.37%	9 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
...termui/view/termuic/termuiRenders/widgetsRender.go	0.00%	10 Missing ⚠️
common/trie.go	0.00%	7 Missing ⚠️
api/groups/proofGroup.go	75.00%	6 Missing ⚠️
common/enablers/epochFlags.go	83.33%	6 Missing ⚠️
common/channels.go	0.00%	3 Missing ⚠️
api/middleware/responseLogger.go	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
common/reflectcommon/structFieldsUpdate.go	60.00%	1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
... and 2 more

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #5008      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   77.65%   80.17%   +2.52%     
==========================================
  Files         656      708      +52     
  Lines       86205    94027    +7822     
==========================================
+ Hits        66941    75390    +8449     
+ Misses      14058    13293     -765     
- Partials     5206     5344     +138     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.