Bridge Mvt -> Eth transfer e2e Test #690
Draft
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
musitdev
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
protocol-units,networks,scripts,util,cicd, ormisc.Mvt -> Eth Transfer e2e test.
Changelog
Update the contract deployment and add the initialize call to the counterpart contract.
Add the
test_eth_client_lock_then_complete_transferto test counterpart contract call.Testing
I create a test that recreate the issue:
RUST_BACKTRACE=1 cargo test --test client_eth_movement test_eth_client_lock_then_complete_transfer -- --nocapture --test-threads=1
Outstanding issues
Still an issue with LockTransfer call that don't works