Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Correct sign error in rolling without slip explanation. #176

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 14, 2024

Conversation

moorepants
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

@moorepants
Copy link
Owner Author

@Peter230655 do you agree I have a sign error here?

@Peter230655
Copy link

Peter230655 commented Mar 14, 2024

I believe you had.

$\bar x_z \times \bar n_y = - \bar n_x$

Maybe $..\times (-r \bar n_y)$ would look a bit nicer than without brackets?

Eq 108 and Eq 109 look correct to me in the preview.

@Peter230655
Copy link

Peter230655 commented Mar 14, 2024

Applying the motion constraint and knowing that ${}^Nv^G=0$, and using eq (104)
gives us this scalar constraint equation.
Would it make sense to refer to eq(104)?
(of course it is in plain sight)

@moorepants moorepants merged commit d35d563 into master Mar 14, 2024
1 check passed
@moorepants moorepants deleted the without-slip-sign branch March 20, 2024 10:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants