-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 347
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Packed protocol version #492
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
perekopskiy
reviewed
May 24, 2024
l1-contracts/contracts/state-transition/chain-interfaces/IGetters.sol
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
vladbochok
reviewed
May 24, 2024
vladbochok
reviewed
May 24, 2024
vladbochok
reviewed
May 24, 2024
vladbochok
reviewed
May 24, 2024
vladbochok
reviewed
May 24, 2024
vladbochok
reviewed
May 24, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@StanislavBreadless We firstly need to bump protocol version and then start using this contract, right?
Co-authored-by: Vlad Bochok <[email protected]>
Use `CONTRACTS_GENESIS_PROTOCOL_SEMANTIC_VERSION` variable
… sb-packed-protocol-version
perekopskiy
reviewed
May 24, 2024
Co-authored-by: perekopskiy <[email protected]>
perekopskiy
approved these changes
May 24, 2024
vladbochok
reviewed
May 24, 2024
vladbochok
approved these changes
May 24, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please fix slither
Raid5594
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 30, 2024
Co-authored-by: perekopskiy <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Vlad Bochok <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: perekopskiy <[email protected]>
Raid5594
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 30, 2024
Co-authored-by: perekopskiy <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Vlad Bochok <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: perekopskiy <[email protected]>
Raid5594
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 30, 2024
Co-authored-by: perekopskiy <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Vlad Bochok <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: perekopskiy <[email protected]>
Deniallugo
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 25, 2024
Co-authored-by: perekopskiy <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Vlad Bochok <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: perekopskiy <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What ❔
Storing
protocolVersion
as a packed semver value.Two potential improvements:
struct
in storage. It gives us more explicit description of what it is. However it causes a much bigger diff code and generally packing will still be needed for theprotocolVersionDeadline
map in STM.Fixes: EVM-637
Why ❔
Checklist